I don’t think that I spelled that right.

  • 12 Posts
  • 218 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 21st, 2023

help-circle









  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.comtoAtheism@feddit.deCrazy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Genesis 22 is a great story.

    It might speak to an older rites of passage for boys to become men among pre-Iseralites of Cannan.

    “Here I am.” … is also an astounding way to respond back to a god. And 22 is neat because it uses both ELOHIM and YHWH but the change is mid story. It links to perhaps two stories pushed into one.

    Really don’t be such a party pooper. The Jewish take on this so I’m told is that their god requires obedience and a sense of duty. The Xian one sees it as an fact of blind faith in their Lord. Islam even has dibs on this story. So I took time to find why it is meaningful. And learn to address that meaning instead of the story.

    All these religious nutties are more interesting when you can offer them more about their texts than they can.







  • This does not make me happy.

    This is why using precedent and RROO is bad mojo for US American parliamentarianism. Very few act in good faith for a legal fiction that is the United States of America. And when the leader, the person in The Office Of The President, acts in bad faith we are fucked for generations if not permanently.

    Now the representatives are abandoning their structure and tradition because the other side did, too.

    We are done here.

    The Hard Left needs to consider revolution.

    edit: maybe i don’t mean the revolution … but the Senate of Rome became vestigial doing the same thing.

    The question for me is this: who will be our person to go from Octavianus to Octavian in front of the world ?