• 0 Posts
  • 87 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzWILD Jellyfish Gang
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    No, my point with “functionally” is that it can be killed.

    Biological immortality is a very specific concept indicating an absence of aging and the absence of an increase in expected mortality along with age.

    I just mean that something can still eat it. This is an easy concept to understand if you’re not focused on correcting people needlessly.




  • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzWILD Jellyfish Gang
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    No, I meant functionally. As in practically. For all intents and purposes. As in under normal conditions.

    It’s like if I said “You meant ‘searching for’ and not ‘looking for’”, when looking indicates visual searching.

    In other words it’s a meaningless distinction in the usage and I would look like a real dickhead pedant if I insisted you use another word.



  • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzWILD Jellyfish Gang
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    There is a species of jellyfish which is functionally immortal. When they get too old they simply turn into children again and re-age.

    Edit: I’m not saying it’s not biologically immortal, I’m saying functionally immortal because I’m indicating that it can still be killed.

    Saying something doesn’t experience aging is not the same as insisting it cannot die.

    2+2=4 is not less correct because 2x2 also equals 4.











  • No, modern polling is mostly useless. The respondents skew heavily in one direction (old people that answer the phone).

    There is no sample size big enough to account for a complete cultural shift away from answering phone calls and text messages from people you don’t know.

    Most polls report a response rate of about 90%, as reported by a PEW analysis of available studies. However, that is a made up number which does not account for attrition (quitters) or non-response to panel recruitment (no answers). If you include those numbers the real response rate is about 3%. Which means between the initial contact and giving their opinion 97% of people asked don’t participate in a given poll.