Lawyers are legally obligated to be advocates for their clients. They have to pursue arguments which may strength their cases.
This may be their only avenue for a defence strategy.
Lawyers are legally obligated to be advocates for their clients. They have to pursue arguments which may strength their cases.
This may be their only avenue for a defence strategy.
“I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.”
Ita also trivial to come to the same conclusion at a smaller scale.
You can run a LLM at home and see the amount of GPU & power resources it takes to compute the larger models. If I ran that full time, your household bill will most likely be 3x alone.
Same stance the UK Post Office took with Horizon. A fucking stupid stance…
This an American thing? This is exactly what happens in the UK.
The key differences is utilities you’re paying for the generation & maintenance of key resources - without gas, water and electricity we wouldn’t be able to survive. Road tax you’re helping to pay for the renewal and upkeep of the road surface (among other local services)… Left alone the road will degrade & will become unusable.
Suspension as a Service is milking what should be a perpetual cost when purchasing the vehicle. If the hardware is already installed, it should be available for the owner to use. They’re not paying for the upkeep of the vehicle, or even ensuring the suspension remains functional… All they’ve done is placed the function behind a pay wall. They can argue they’re maintaining the software, but it’s utter bullshit and I hate the fact this has become a norm within B2B (for example network appliances)
At least with luxury subscriptions such as Spotify, Netflix, NYT, etc you’re getting access to their content, which they renew. Here you get access to something you should have had access to from day 1.
Because since 2016 they’ve learnt there is zero consequences for such actions. In fact, even when there is bad publicity, their fan base is more like a cult following and supports them more.
All the social media engineering they did REALLY dug deep with the impressionables.
Why? Its hardware is dog shit.
Never knew it was illegal in the UK. Didn’t surprise me though to learn it was Margaret Thatcher who outlawed it again in the 80s.
Roblox_oof.mp3 is a masterpiece.
Agree with her views on algorithm transparency, however abolishing anonymous accounts won’t improve the situation around misinformation.
Facebook has required your real name for a long time, and it still resorted into people dissecting into echo chambers supporting their views points.
Yes, anonymous accounts allow people to hide behind a mask, but a lot of people spreading misinformation aren’t afraid of being humiliated or ridiculed. It even helps spread it faster (celebrities, influencers, etc) in a lot of situations.
Still true. Their only job is to raise tickets, and ensure the basic troubleshooting steps have been taken.
They’re not paid enough to do any more than that.
Even if they were blocking posts, it’ll be because FB purposely wrapped them to look like an Ad
Considering he knew exactly how many votes he needed to win Georgia, couldn’t this be used against him in court?
Everytime I listen to “Status Report”, I start grinning like a cheshire cat.
This, among other shitty behaviour, is why I avoid Amazon now. It’s just a horrible shopping experience.
At least they have physical buttons below the screen for media, hazards and heated windscreens & seats, plus all the steering wheel controls.
Much like naming a company “X”
Think you’ve forgotten GOP hired Cambridge Analytica, who’s sole job was to pursued the ‘impressionables’.
This is a party whose voter base love playing victim, and never considers if something is fake. They’re constantly being bombarded by racicalized clickbate headlines because they swollow it up, especially when it matches their beliefs. It’s like they’re in a constant pressure cooker.
Look how fast the pet-eating thing with Springfield went.