Is that fucking Adolf Kitler?
Is that fucking Adolf Kitler?
I remember seeing it and thinking “No, this can’t be real. No way Apple actually did this.”
Edit: I just checked and if you apply all upgrades, the total hardware cost is $12,348. That’s 3.5th the price of the future Vision Pro
Nebula should have a free trial period.
Also good on Voyager.
Sync manages these long vertical images the best.
You fucking moron. Oops…
It will also complain that trying to break into the castle is unsafe, so you have to tell it that you know.
If it’s on the disk, why doesn’t the image get removed when I erase all partitions? Does the firmware put it back?
Autism level: infinity
Not enough downvotes.
This is a good picture.
Nobody said a website didn’t work on Firefox.
The market share is so low because of the same reason Linux’s share is low: people use what most people use. When they get a new computer, they either don’t know much and stick to Edge (which is Chromium) or install Chrome because that’s what they are familiar with, and the reason they’re familiar with it is because most people used that, so they also tried that. If they use other browsers, they just don’t care enough to switch, no matter if it’s much better or how easy switching is.
Pre-installs are also a reason, as I’ve said before about Edge. So if a well-known computer manufacturer put Linux on most of their laptops and a new computer user would buy one of them, they would just use Firefox cuz that’s what pre-installed on most distros, and if more new users buy it who don’t know about Chrome, Firefox market share becomes even bigger.
Most people just don’t care enough to switch if their current setup works. Let it be Linux, Mac, Firefox or any less-used product.
Happle
Hattle
A hat made of apple
I don’t know how people get this. I tried but it didn’t do this.
India joins the party 🥳
GNOME should set better defaults. I shouldn’t need even two extensions for basic desktop functions (I know minimize button doesn’t need an extension, not specifically that).
Anyone else get the feeling that GPT-3.5 is becoming dumber?
I made an app for myself that can be used to chat with GPT and it also had some extra features that ChatGPT didn’t (but now has). I didn’t use it (only Bing AI sometimes) for some time and now I wanted to use it again. I had to fix some API stuff because the OpenAI module jumped to 1.0.0, but that didn’t affect any prompt (this is important: it’s my app, not ChatGPT, so cannot possibly be a prompt cause if I did nothing) and I didn’t edit what model it used.
When everything was fixed, I started using it and it was obviously dumber than it was before. It made things up, misspelled the name of a place and other things.
This can be intentional, so people buy ChatGPT Premium and use GPT-4. At least GPT-4 is cheaper from the API and it’s not a subscription.
My thoughts. If you have a really long conversation or the prompt is really big, it might forget or not notice stuff.
When I analyze a melody I play on a piano, I see that it reflects the music I heard that day or sometimes, even music I heard and liked years ago.
Having parts similar or a part that is (coincidentally) identical to a part from another song is not stealing and does not infringe upon any law.