I think rather d/dx is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x in that expression. For example, dx²/dx is best understood as d/dx (x²). The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.
The BBC report cited mainly focused on the marketing industry, with the fixing mistake people being the copywriters. This gives a strong vibe of Madman, where you have the “old-fashioned” copywriters and the tension between market research.
Monetize sovereignty.
Aktually, for most Internet services in China today, one already needs a phone number to create an account, which is linked back to the national ID. So, there isn’t any anonymity to begin with.
But have you factored in the chance of US intervention?
Side note, Muji 無印 literally means “no brand”.
Students, I’m a total baka hentai amirite?
Guys??
You mean they spend zero time on showmanship training and thus twirling rifles serves a practical and essential combat purpose?
Zen master says: the real issue resolution is within yourself.
Referenced by my favorite Philip K Dick novel VALIS, the symbol of early Christianity: Fish cannot carry guns.
That documentation sounds like marriage.
Or you can just simply slap your face. It has a similar sound effect.
It’s all right. Deep down, we are all animals.
Lots of animals unironically do this.
Microsoft employee: do you want to give me a raise?
Yes
Remind me later
It’s more nuanced than that. I would characterize a significant portion of FLOSS philosophy and participants as “libertarianism” (in the US politics sense).
On LGBTQ issues, they seem to be compatible with “gay and communism”, but a litmus test would be whether a member would support the use of FLOSS for
Interpreting the licences in their literal text would mean that the above are not only allowed, but in fact part of the “liberty” the license aims to protect.
The tragedy is that lots of “gay and communism” participants will find themselves betrayed by the libertarian elements once an actual choice appears in reality, such as when people try to “patch” the movement with Code of Conduct.
The problem, in my opinion, roots in the tendencies of the founding members towards “tech neutrality”. This is turn is a result of the US hippie movement’s ideology of “no ideology”.