In the very first article within hours of it happening, I read that the secret service fired at the dude and he ran away. (I guess they missed?)
Since I see titles being intentionally ambiguous about the shots, like if he was shot at again.
In the very first article within hours of it happening, I read that the secret service fired at the dude and he ran away. (I guess they missed?)
Since I see titles being intentionally ambiguous about the shots, like if he was shot at again.
His base is turning on him, and they’re the degenerate weirdos who think the only way to save the republican movement is to kill Trump. They learned this brilliant tactic from Trump himself, he even gave them some training exercises with Mike Pence and Nancy Pelosi.
Trump has used and hurt his voter base a lot, I’m not surprised they’re coming back to get him.
Freedom or something.
Shiit so many comments here.
If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment
I was thinking that too. We already have other weapons that are this effective, and we’ve banned them.
In most cases for the banned weapons, the US got to use them for a while first, which is what’s happening here.
2003, old news but okay.
While some of Harris’ 2003 literature said that Harris had “tried” hundreds of cases, other campaign literature at the time said she had “prosecuted” hundreds of cases – including her campaign website, which used the word “prosecuted” instead of “tried,” according to a version of the web page viewed by ABC News via the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine.
Experts told ABC News that’s an important distinction.
“A prosecutor prosecuting the case means that they were the attorney on the case where someone were facing charges. When you have tried a case, that means that case is going to trial,” said ABC News legal contributor Brian Buckmire. “So the number of prosecuting cases should be a higher number than trying a case, because you may have a case that doesn’t go to trial because the person takes a plea, the case get dismissed, whatever may be, you still prosecute that case. But you only tried a case that has gone to trial.”
It seems there were no “experts”. There was one person and he worked for ABC news as a “legal contributor”. They don’t even call him an expert.
It’s in the job requirements
There’s really no need to get angry and attack people personally because you don’t like their opinion. My comment is extremely tame and you’re allowed to not agree.
I’m not a redditor lol. It says reddit wanderer, as I have been wandering since the day RIF stopped working. I have not returned to reddit. Nice try with the ad hominem though
Can’t put my finger on it, but I feel we have a word for fatally shooting people.
I guess we’re avoiding the word gun in titles now…
Readily available means you don’t need to search. Y’all are on another level searching for this shit lmao.
In your head in confirms what you want, because you’re biased. You just don’t know what “readily available” means. Can’t help you there. Your entire article makes my point…
The content on telegram is there almost indefinitely, and readily available. What youre sharing is almost instant bans, includes also reports to links of suspected activity, not the content directly.
Haha, young ? i wish. But go on making stuff up.
So now it’s not that it’s readily available, it’s that it was in the beginning. So everyone is allowed to let CP go in the first years of their platform? Is that what youre going with. Eww
Riiight
Edit: Is telegram really an encrypted messaging app (spoiler: no) get off your high horse defending exiled russian oligarchs in the name of encryption.
I don’t recall CP/gore being readily available on those platforms, it gets reported/removed pretty quickly.
There’s a lot of really really dark shit on telegram that’s for sure, and it’s not like signal where they are just a provider. They do have control the content
talk radio host Jay Weber tried to parody Tim Walz, tweeting, “Meet my son Gus. He’s a blubbering bitch boy. His mother and I are very proud.” Weber later said that he deleted his tweet after learning that Gus was disabled—he just meant to attack a 17-year-old boy for being emotional.(Weber has since deleted his explanatory tweet as well.)
What a bunch of weirdos
He doesn’t like having towin the election. He would much rather it just be given to him, like everything else in his life.