

Pro Tip: if they start talking about what a ‘wonderful family man’ he was or some other such bullshit, reply with photos of Nazis with their families and pets.
Pro Tip: if they start talking about what a ‘wonderful family man’ he was or some other such bullshit, reply with photos of Nazis with their families and pets.
Yeah, what is up with our gun-obsessed culture anyhow? Switzerland for example has about as many guns per person as we do, but they’re not nutso gun worshippers like we are. What gives?
Just sweet, all-lovin’ folks, yeah? /s
Someone with a Xitter account should be replying with these on all those ‘family man’ posts popping up
Some bring joy wherever they go… others, whenever they go
Oooh do it
That one with Hitler and his dog is a good one
Since you were wondering, this was the part I was replying to:
whatever they were going to do, is going to taken up a few notches.
They were going to do that anyways. Playing nice will gain us nothing.
That is my comment.
WTF even is this comment?
Oh noooo, the people talking about putting autistic people in camps and currently sending PoC people to camps and siccing the army on civilians might do bad things more if we fight back!
Let’s just ask them nicely and I’m sure they’ll pause their evil a little bit!
Are you serious?
They’re trying to make him big again. So much for that, I guess
They say you should only say good things about the dead.
Charlie Kirk is dead. Good.
Now that’s an obituary I can read with great satisfaction.
Simple. It’s not only about how much they have, it’s about how much we don’t have.
They also hate that the plebeians can do things they can’t, and they want the ability to do those things themselves, immediately, but without having to put in anything as low-brow as effort or practice.
Up until now, they had to settle for paying lots of money to get those things and keep them for themselves—witness the art gallery scene—but this poses them two problems: they didn’t actually make it, and worse, they had to part with their precious money to get it.
Now they think AI will let them make anything they want, do anything they want, and never have to pay artists or workers, so they can keep even more of their precious money.
So? There’s no harm in trying anyways. Why are you so against a small test on the off-chance it could save a friend’s life? It’s not as if you’re being asked to submit a whole kidney for testing or something.
The hell you on about? People do that all the time.
I’m part of a big group now that is in a pool doctors all over the US can check to see if they can find a match for people, because a friend of mine died from leukemia a long time ago. They couldn’t find a match for him, but maybe I can match with someone else someday.
BTW, gonna shamelessly plug NMDP. They do good work.
Because those people weren’t armed.
Edit: and if that wasn’t true, why are the racists trying to disarm them?
Because in America things like the Tulsa Race Massacre happen a fair bit, and the cops either stand by or join in, so you have to be able to defend you and yours.
Remember folks, armed minorities are harder to oppress.
Yeah, this is just code for ‘hey middle-class people, Mamdani might be coming for you next!’
Ahh, the ol’ ‘nothing to hide’ defense.
Ever consider things that are labeled as ‘crimes’ can and will be anything the people in power want?
Just because, say, calling Republicans ‘shithead pedophiles’ on Lemmy isn’t illegal now doesn’t mean Cheeto Mussolini won’t make it illegal tomorrow.
I think you signed up on the wrong instance; have you considered moving to .ml?
I dunno man. That guy murdered a bunch of babies via plague, killed some kids via siccing a bear on them to maul them to death, wiped out almost all life on the planet because he didn’t like how the humans—a very small sect of life on the planet—was acting, slaughtered a city, denied man knowledge, and loves songs about babies’ heads getting dashed on rocks.
Oh, and if he really is responsible for everything, then he’s responsible for creating a world where living beings have to kill other living beings to survive in the first place.
Even if he’s real, I don’t think he’s worthy of worship. They claim he’s all-loving, but that love seems pretty darn limited and conditional.
I much prefer Sir Terry Pratchett’s take: if there is a god, then it is up to us to become his moral superior.
Is this satire? Please tell me this is satire