If energy becomes cheap, they lose money. If the stock market doesn’t see their profits rise every quarter, they will trade for less.
These major corps think of societal impact only in the monetary/cash flow sense and lobby heavily to support their position.
We’d need to adjust some rules, and educate more people on nuclear power
Yeah but I’d rather not have the mods remove anything - it’s the ol’ “how do we fact check the fact checkers” conundrum.
One instance of an object or subject, can be viewed completely differently relative to your position in space and time. The observations of how something is functioning can be completely different from one observer to another, yet they can both be correct at the same time.
So how exactly do you tell the truths from the untruths without proving intentional manipulation in the first place?