

Tell me you know nothing about the kennedys without saying you know nothing about the kennedys
Tell me you know nothing about the kennedys without saying you know nothing about the kennedys
None of this is retracted, and these aren’t the manufacturer’s markings. I’ll go ahead and be dumb enough to believe the reporting from all these ‘“news” orgs’. I am now propagandized into believing that a clearly unwell person made a potentially unusual decision.
It’s got lots of uses:
AFAIK, the casings messages are real, just different than originally reported. And while it’s true major news orgs have an anti left bias, it doesn’t manifest in this specific way. They tend to accurately report these kinds of facts in a timely manner.
Then again, the WSJ did break with this behavior, so maybe things are changing and I need to recalibrate.
https://xcancel.com/DavidShuster/status/1966576856515203480
I still think it’s too early to call this, I’m not seeing reporting by major orgs on it. It does seem plausible based on the messages on the casings, but I also thought it plausible he was a leftist
deleted by creator
This is the one post I’ve seen here that actually tackles the main problems. Climate change can’t be stopped without degrowth, which means putting a stop to capitalism.
I’d like to add: while there would be a lot we’d have to give up, life under a degrowth economy would be good. Way better than what we have now. We’d all have more leisure time to focus on stuff that matters. Sure, we’d have fewer gadgets and toys, but we’d be able to spend more time with loved ones and engaging in creative and fulfilling hobbies.
This is extremely important: we are not at the point of no return.
Climate change can be stopped, even now. It will take lots of work, but it’s possible.
ClimateAdam, who has a PhD in climate science from Oxford, made a video about this. It’s 5 years old, but he’s still making videos with similar points today. It’s my understanding this is still the predominant view amongst climate scientists. The main reason I think this is that there aren’t many calling for geoengineering, which if we were at the point of no return would be something we’d have to explore.
The reason this is so important is because as climate change denial becomes more and more infeasible, it will get replaced primarily with climate change defeatism. The sooner we start pushing back on this, the better.
Cut them some slack, they’re engineers… And beyond that, they are engineers
Excellent point
What do they know about women?
The reference, for those who don’t get it
Because it’s the wrong size
If you want to talk about fixing our broken political system, we need to consider uncapping the total number of House Reps
The US came very close to having a first amendment that had a low cap for the number of people one house rep could represent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Apportionment_Amendment
Legitimately curious: what about this statement makes you think I need to take pills?
[Edit: Ok, I did some more research and realized I was mistaken. I thought it was an uncontroversial claim that the CIA provided material support to the crack cocaine trade in the US; it is not.]
Will the skin also be supported by the CIA
100% agree with this sentiment
Here is Christine Pelosi, daughter of Nancy Pelosi, saying “It is quite likely that some of our faves are implicated.” Democrats and their billionaire owners are just as implicated by this as Republicans.
https://xcancel.com/sfpelosi/status/1147657745253855233?lang=en
This is reading, not writing. USB sends a dummy zero every few consecutive 1s for framing purposes. If you want the details Ben Eater has a great video on it.
The most important part of this is the primaries. If we fill these seats with a bunch of Chuck Schumers/Hakeem Jeffries it won’t make a difference. If we fill them with Zohran Mamdanis, on the other hand…
deleted by creator
Being good at hiding your vice is not a virtue