You’re answering in good faith, which is less common here than even on reddit, you’ll likely only get replies regurgitating cynical takes and memes unfortunately.
You’re answering in good faith, which is less common here than even on reddit, you’ll likely only get replies regurgitating cynical takes and memes unfortunately.
Your point, other than a mindlessly cynical take, is quite unclear.
And yet somehow remain slightly more credible than most Israeli media on the issue.
Absolutely, everything you’ve stated is correct. My comment wasn’t intended as a comment on AI, but on the cynical and knee-jerk take offered.
Puddle-deep “analyses” such as yours is tiring as well.
You might want to continue to learn about the issue, as your comment is not exactly an even analysis. It seems more like a narrative wrapped up in surface-level analysis.
I hear ya, the democracy part might be a lil hyperbolic but even if we get to the funding deadline next month, there will be plenty of ripples felt. I do think they will eventually settle on Donalds (the rep, not orange Donald) or someone close to the freedom caucus but whoever they settle on will have the same issues as McCarthy.
That…makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I do see the overarching point you’re trying to make but your suggestion is not how this will play out.
Honestly, I’d consider it more likely you need medication and some time offline but hey you do you, friend.
Outside of the cynical bluster of all your comments in this post, you’ve certainly convinced me of that assumption.
Oddly, I’d trust someone closer to senility more than someone who can’t even spell it.
I mean, I’m more familiar with the 30 years of evolving values since the show aired.
We’ll simply have to agree to disagree on that, as I see shaming anyone for being gay as a pretty shitty thing to do, regardless of context.
Funny, as the subtext of your comment suggests, grossly, that there is something wrong with that.
Clearly education isn’t your priority, as you proudly make clear you don’t have much of one. To turn it slightly uncivil, go be 14 years old elsewhere.
Wasn’t being uncivil, nor was that my intent, just clearly suggesting that if you don’t know much about a topic, perhaps having some self-restraint and not commenting would be a better course for all.
My biggest socialedia pet peeve: why is it that those who know the least of a topic are the first to comment on it?
To add context to the answer below, its significant as she was one of the few Repubs who publicly blamed Trump for Jan 6, but she’s been tacking hard right as of late.
You’re so, so close to self-reflection but alas.
If something that’s posted twice is a duplicate, what does one call something that’s been posted at least a dozen times already today?
Written like an always online 14 yr old.