One of the major accusations was that they asked too much of Madison for a single person to accomplish, and fired her over not meeting their expectations. While this is not great, it’s not legally problematic.

Yes, but that’s not how it works in practice. Running a government is a huge money-making machine, and so it attracts the worst kind of people.

Of course they are in it for the money, what do you think?

They didn’t need the army of lawyers to get license deals, so that’s not a fair comparison.

This is almost certainly not intentional. The AI just can’t differentiate between unsafe as in NSFW and unsafe as in manual memory management.

He’d get a medal here. We have offical signs with “pigeons are flying rats” here.

As someone who had to pay 13 cents per minute in the 90s, this sadly was not an option.

No, back in the 90s, ISPs had local clones of the entire Usenet subscribers could access directly.

Google did not extend XMPP. They let it sit there for a decade, not changing anything. They still only supported SSL 2.0 when servers started to require TLS 1.2 for S2S connections. They didn’t implement any extensions, some vital to the ecosystem back then.

It’ll settle somewhere around 3° to 5°, because that’s the point where the global economy collapses irrecoverably. There’s no other way that we’re going to get out of this.

We brought value to the shareholders!

I think winning is not the goal of the Western military, the goal is to reduce the amount of military equipment in Russia to a historic low. This can’t be accomplished by winning quickly.

It’s only under copyright if it’s a significant portion of the work. Single sentences are not enough, unless it’s a short poem.

Well, they will have to work together in the future.

https://youtu.be/COqq7862wcU?si=00hm_a4zLR6z9WgK Great documentary.

Yes, especially since they don’t have to be fitted like clothes or shoes. It’s off-the-shelf anyways.

That’s the one thing where I agree with Musk, they’re not necessary.

I’m sure that the smell doesn’t uphold that declaration.

The main problem is that there’s no business case. It does not provide value to the company to delete your data, so why would resources be allocated to it?

The only solution is that the fines are higher than the costs for implementing a deletion process.

Most of them are older than 80 anyways.

You’re presuming a state of mind, just as the other people you’re arguing against are. We don’t know if they regret it or not and never will.