artyom

Right, how does this image relate to that?

I know what rule 34 is, I’m asking where this image came from

It doesn’t dismiss anything. It’s just a statement of fact. Certainly in certain contexts it could be interpreted that way.

What’s Rule34?

Whether you know it or not does not change the message. Abusive couples shouldn’t not use this app, they shouldn’t be couples.

Ohhhh I see

What is this

Oof.

tldw?

a government agency can surely decrypt it if they truly wanted to

They can’t. Not using any known technology. Even basic encryption like AES256 would take 10^50 years on a supercomputer. That’s not even getting into quantum-resistant encryption.

Which has nothing to do with encryption?

I mean to my knowledge the US hasn’t tried to force encryption backdoors recently?

Listened to the first episode and I don’t have any negative feedback. You might consider running your audio through Auphonic. Really great hands-off editor that can take quality to another level. But it’s fine as is.

They don’t care. It’s not their information and there are no consequences.

We have heard this non-sense before, only to find it’s trivially easy to connect to your PID.

This is fine.

USE GRAPHENEOS

AntennaPod is the obligatory open source client.

How is that a “fingerprint”?

The region that repeatedly insists on backdoors in any encrypted communications?