… Ok, fair. 11,000 years was the wrong cut-off date. 12 - 13,000 years would have illustrated my point better.
… Ok, fair. 11,000 years was the wrong cut-off date. 12 - 13,000 years would have illustrated my point better.
Not even anywhere near that long. There have been humans for probably more than 200,000 years. Probably more. It gets confusing when you go back that far. But our written history only accounts for maybe 10,000 of those years. So 5% of total human history, if we take the minimum estimate of what it takes for us to be human. We have no evidence to support the fact that human advancement even lasts as long as written history. I mean, shit… the Romans had central heating and cement, and then they died out and we forgot how to do those things for 1,000 years. Our knowledge, and the acquisition of same is not exactly linear. Lots of fits and starts over the course of the various human civilizations that have occurred.
What happened 11,000 years ago? I mean, we’ve got some pottery fragments. Other than that, ???
Depends on your definition of “long-term”. The biggest accomplishments of Man have been acknowledged for maybe 10,000 years at the very extreme limits. 10,000 years is not even a drop in the bucket of geological or celestial time. So it very much depends on your perspective.
'Cause I’m drunk on a Thursday (Friday very early in the morning), and I’ve lost control of my life.
I’d watch that tape.
See - shit like this is why I don’t really get my hopes up for the UAP hearings. Trump randomly throws out nuclear secrets just to impress people, because he’s a dumb piece of shit. Does anybody really think that idiot could keep his trap shut about proof of alien life?
MLA format would be something like this:
Maneuver, The Picard. The Delusion. Picard, 2023.
Then, in your paper, to reference it, just write “(Maneuver 2023)”.
… Or you could just read a history book that wasn’t written by a Mao fanboi.
Translation: Bjørn Gulden is putting out feelers to see if Kanye is still universally hated for his antisemitic comments so he can decide whether it would be a good business decision to reinstate the Yeezy line.
My bad! Another classic. Mel Brooks just does not miss.
Is it fair to say that Mel Brooks movies are uncommon now? Have they gotten old enough that people today are generally ignorant of them? If so, “Blazing Saddles”, “History of the World: Part 1”, “Young Frankenstein”, and “Spaceballs” are incredibly worthy of a watch.
smh Man should’ve watched Key & Peele.
Which bible verse did they study to split the atom
Edit: in case it isn’t obvious, /s.
I’m guessing he’s wearing the Steven Crowder shirt, actually. It’s got that same picture of Che on it, with the same font. If that’s the case, the shirt’s full message says “Socialism is for f*gs”. The “is for f*gs” part is underneath Che’s face, and so is obscured in this image.
I would normally link to that shirt, but fuck Steven Crowder. Not gonna be responsible for driving traffic to that shithead’s website.
I love this guy’s channel. Two of my other favorite things he’s done are: Uppest Case / Lowest Case, and that time he Reverse Emulated a NES.