It’s not, you know it isn’t. You just don’t like the outcome of it because you’re already left with no arguments and are clutching at fallacious straws. It’s ok though, you do you. You’re either a troll or just not very good at arguing your point. Either way, you have been blocked as I have better things to do with my time.
I’d be willing to entertain you if the question was related to the thread at all but I don’t see how it is.
Are you trying to compare the USA selling missiles to Israel to Glock producing pistols? And a troubled teenager with a gun to a genocidal maniac?
How is that a fix? You added weight to my argument.
“The world” is not letting it happen though. The USA were the only country to veto the 2 cease-fire Security Council resolutions early in the conflict, only to later propose a washed down, toothless resolution.
The USA remains silent over the ICJ’s ruling after South Africa’s genocide case.
The USA are the ones slapping Netanyahu on the wrist but still supplying him with weapons, money and intelligence.
The fact that it’s a 10 year contract has nothing to do with the issue. Surely your weapons and money being used to perpetrate a genocide would be reason enough to breach the contract, if there was political will. The problem is, there isn’t.
On iOS I’ve been using Vinegar - Tube Cleaner by developer And a Dinosaur. It doesn’t replace YouTube as a whole - only the video player. Better interface, no ads.
Of course not. Israel is not only rounding up Palestinians but also bombing them, raping them, destroying their infrastructure, killing international aid workers to stop help coming in, destroying their schools and hospitals, … all with the support, political, financial and in weapons, of “the west”, led by the USA.
Edit: and with very little hope of that changing after elections. https://theintercept.com/2024/08/30/kamala-harris-cnn-interview-israel-gaza/
So are the USA, or at the very least being complicit and enabling. Furthermore, of the Palestinians themselves!
Ah NFS… It’s so good when it works! When it doesn’t though, figuring out why is like trying to navigate someone else’s house in pitch dark.
FUD wars on Free and Open Source Software, shady deals with companies and governments to make them dependent on MS software and solutions, holding the web hostage to IE “standards”, …
Could you provide a source for this claim? Not doubting you but I haven’t seen it.
That reminds me of that joke:
Two economists are walking side-by-side.
One tells the other: I’ll give you $100 if you take a shit on the pavement.
He proceeds to shit on the pavement and grab the $100.
He then tells the other economist: I’ll give you $100 if you eat my shit.
The other does the deed and collects his $100.
After walking a few more blocks, one of them says: both of us left our dignity with that work back there and neither of us are any richer!
To which the other responds: no, but we grew our combined GDP to $200.
And they both walked away happy, patting each other on their backs.
Latinum is only valuable outside of the Federation, where societies are not post-scarcity.
Now, before you argue that there are no material conditions demanding scarcity in (some of) them, I’ll add that artificial scarcity is scarcity nonetheless.
You’re arguing against a straw man. They never said it ceases to exist, only that it’s irrelevant.
Oh ok, so you’re skeptical of anything coming from people born in China. There’s a name for that, if only I could remember…
Nothing are British.
Just don’t overdo it. In large quantities, xylitol is a powerful laxative.
I run it on my router which has the CG-NAT IP address.
Whilst you’re right that it could clash, it’s very unlikely (a 1 in 4194302 chance), I imagine Tailscale would detect the clash and change IPs though I could be wrong as it never happened to me (and probably never will - though in all fairness it will eventually happen to someone).
Been using Tailscale behind CG-NAT for years. It works wonderfully and very rarely needs to route through the DERP infrastructure - it’s almost always a P2P connection.
You’re not wrong that the storage itself is undoubtedly more robust on any cloud provider than a cheap consumer NAS box.
However, there are other factors to consider.
A NAS or any storage solution is only useful if you can access it if you need and if the network speed and stability match your expectations.
A cloud solution will be inaccessible if your internet is down. It may also suffer tremendously if your connection is unstable or slow.
In that sense, even a laptop’s drive connected to your switch could prove more robust than any cloud solution.
They could be, but 2M new Brazilian users after Twitter’s block there actually seems quite low and definitely credible.