Da Bald Eagul
18NB🏳️⚧️, die/diens (they/them)
- 0 Posts
- 79 Comments
9·5 days agoThey spend their free time raping each other, torturing prey and getting high from pufferfish…
Global keyboard shortcuts are pretty nice. E.g. muting yourself without alt tabbing to your browser.
Same with “Do you mind doing x?” “Yeah sure”; so you mind doing it? I get what they mean with the response, but it annoys me every time haha
Me, humanity sucks
The mails are being rate limited :( I don’t have mine yet either.
It will be federated after a bit, the owner first wants to see how intensive it is on the server I believe
3·18 days agoThe H in ADHD is always used now. I’ve got a diagnosis ADHD and don’t have the H either. It’s just what it’s called now.
Oh really? Whoops, my bad then
It indeed looks like Little Kitty, Big City!
The game is available on a bunch of platforms, including XBox,
PS5, Nintendo Switch & Steam (it is also Steam Deck verified).Edit: not on PS5 apparently
3·21 days agoWouldn’t that just be a fertility rate below 1?
Rate of 2: 2 babies are born per human death, population grows
Rate of 1: 1 baby is born per death, population remains the same
Rate of 0.5: 1 baby is born for every 2 deaths, pop. decreases.
Rate of 0: no babies are born, but people still die.
What would a negative fertility rate mean? A rate of -1? I don’t think it could exist.
1·24 days agoAlso note that 100km is the minimum height to be “in space”, not the minimum height for achieving orbit.
That doesn’t really mean anything. You could achieve an orbit at a lower altitude if you wanted to, it would decay faster, but you could do it. The 100km karman line is an arbitrary thing, there is no solid line where on one side you can orbit and on the other side you can’t.
I agree; the comment I was replying to seemed to imply that there was a minimum height requirement, or height by itself equaled orbit. But that’s just my interpretation of it.
Well this seems like a bad semantic argument to me.
Maybe it is, but personally I prefer to see the result 100% finished. I am very impressed by the booster catch, and the non-stop camera feed on Starship was awesome, but I would like to see a full mission before saying that they reached orbit. And to me, demonstrating capability usually means doing it.
So what you’re saying is that SpaceX deliberatly doesn’t let Starship orbit, to keep reentry predictable. Which is what Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de said; they don’t actually orbit.
Also note that 100km is the minimum height to be “in space”, not the minimum height for achieving orbit.
Finally, I disagree with the note that having “enough fuel” to reach orbit means they have demonstrated such capability; I believe they easily could achieve this, but they haven’t actually demonstrated it yet.
Yes, you can find him here
I’ve said “What? Huh?” out loud at least three times after reading this post.