Interestingly, the quote notes that using homeless as an adjective is fine, while using it as a noun is not. I did not know that!

Well…the headline only says the planet is 6.9 times as big as Earth. Jupiter is at least that large, last time I checked, so without more context I also don’t know what is special about it.

The actor?!

Against the terms of agreements they made? Yes.

To be fair, this is what I meant when I said wrong. Enough people have taken umbrage with my wording that I think I should update it, though. Thank you for your reply.

My understanding is that the IA had implemented a digital library, where they had (whether paid or not) some number of licenses for a selection of books. This implementation had DRM of some variety that meant you could only read the book while it was checked out. In theory, this means if the IA has 10 licenses of a book, only 10 people have a usable copy they borrowed from the IA at a time.

And then the IA disabled the DRM system, somehow, and started limitlessly lending the books they had copies of to anyone that asked.

I definitely don’t like the obnoxious copyright system in the USA, but what the IA did seems obviously wrong against the agreement they entered into. Like if your local library got a copy of Book X and then when someone wanted to borrow it they just copied it right there and let you keep the copy.

ETA: updated my wording. I don’t believe what the IA did was morally wrong, per se, but rather against the agreement I presume they entered into with the owners of the books they lent.

I feel like in that case one would be loudly fighting to get the law changed, rather than insisting it’s actually fine. Maybe that’s just semantics.

I do not understand what point you’re making. Can you elaborate?

Women are so cute and cute and cute and cute and cute and cute and cute and cute and cute and cute and…

I predict that in under 4 years, he’ll have run to Russia for sanctuary, where he’ll tweet for the rest of his days. He’ll make some kind of comparison between himself and Snowden. The media will start to report less and less on what he says, and people will pay less and less attention to him as he is no longer able to do rallies.

😰 Danke!

I speak English, I studied Latin but have not kept up, and I know a tiny bit of Japanese and French.

A hit-piece commissioned by the Joker to distract you from his upcoming bank heist!!!

Relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/2071/

Not directed at you, OP, but rather the poster in the image. What insane Internet circles are they in that this is the content they’re seeing?

Seems legit as a concept, though the author is giving weird vibes.

I’m not sure what “globohomo” means but it sounds like a 4chan homophobic term. Additionally the author says they wanted a search engine giving results without “political inclinations”, which reads to me as “reality has a liberal bias and I don’t like that”.

I’ll pass on this for now.

Jesus. What a shit heel, trying to enlist people during graduation. The fucking audacity.

I wonder if he means that in the sense of “putting you in jail is only going to empower your frankly rabid base of supporters. I need to avoid even the slightest hint of a mistrial so we can put you in prison for good.”

Let’s not share the version with the credit cropped, folks. Come on.

How?

I have been able to join my partner’s family group chats at long last, to much fanfare. It’s nice, because there’s a lot of great people I just haven’t been keeping up with since I couldn’t join the chat and was not about to buy an entire phone for one chat protocol.

Only problem I’ve had so far is that I can’t see who’s specifically reacting to messages when I try to tap into it. IDK if that’s in line with the traditional iMessage experience though.

My understanding is that this absolutely applies to their previous iterations, but not this – there’s no authenticating with your Apple ID, for example. It’s sending and receiving iMessage data directly between the Apple servers and your device, now.