• 2 Posts
  • 368 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • I work as a glorified code monkey. It feels faster, sort of, in fits and starts.

    When I start working on a task, the AI tooling almost feels like it’s doing the job for me. It picks out the relevant part of the code base, makes changes in the right places, and even updates tests.

    Assuming that part all went well, the waiting game begins.

    Either run the “git” AI prompt or do it by hand. The prompt way has some nice bells and whistles in how it formats commit messages , but

    It’s

    Just

    So

    Slow!

    Then, either way, my commit goes. Now I wait for the auto build and test pipeline, the code scanner job, and copilot’s review pass. Sometimes it brings up helpful things, sometimes it raises silly objections.

    Then, ok, I think it looks good. I need approval from a busy coworker to actually click merge, so I send a link to the chat and hope someone isn’t too busy.

    Once I get that approval, it’s wait again for a build agent to deploy my changes.

    Now, hours later (sometimes the next day), I can load it up and see my change reflected in our test environment.

    The wheels sure are spinning, but I can’t say for sure that we’re going any faster.


  • Huh, that doesn’t match my understanding (TBF I don’t work in the field).

    Looking again at the study… Dr. Jain had a second person split the students into two groups. I’m not sure whether she conducted the followup exams or had yet another person do that. Assuming that the students were strict about not talking about which toothbrush they were using, I suppose you could call it a ‘blinded’ experiment. I don’t really see how you could double it, though.








  • No. Double blind means that both the researchers and the participants don’t know who is in which group (control group or experimental group). The idea is to avoid spoiling studies with the placebo effect.

    It’s kind of hard to avoid knowing that you’re in the control group when you’re being asked to brush with an old-fashioned toothbrush instead of an electric one.




  • From that study:

    A randomized double-blind clinical trial was conducted

    LOL! I do not think that means what they thought it means. Kinda hard to keep the participants from knowing which study group they’re in.

    Still, interesting setup. 60 dental students makes sure that the control group brushing manually is doing so with proper technique. They were getting the best-case scenario for manual brushing.