Thank you for explaining this!

I have learned a bit…

Nice post.

I won’t kink shame you, you do you!

Have a great day!

Not sure what your point is.

Good luck!

Three-way race has been called out for past couple of weeks by independent voices on YT.

In a warning sign for Democrats, Kennedy was the leading choice for young voters, aged 18-34, in the poll’s surveyed population — 38 percent of whom chose the environmental lawyer. From the same age group, 32 percent picked Biden and 27 percent went for Trump.

People on the left stopped supporting RFK Jr. when it came to the Palestine, but he does take people from Trump/Biden.

One year out so lots of things can change.

Blue MAGA or MAGA

I am neither.

Thanks for the info!

Thank you for the links and the reply!

Video is a debate, so it would require to make time for it or to treat as podcast and listen while on the move.

I do not agree with Musk.

Have a great day!

hhhhaaaa

Reminds me of this random vid. on farts:

Monty Python - I Fart in your General Direction [0:15]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ro4DrewXHE

Oh no…

Why would they do this to themselves?! Why?!

Dots are better than spaces.

Tab vs. spaces, spaces.

I prefer dots over spaces.

Spaces can mess with stuff, double space…

Twitter files shows a direct line of gov’t censorship on certain topics in social media.

These also includes our alphabet agencies in this censorship.

Many like to watch debates on such topics, I am one that does.

I assume you don’t like such videos, so that is my bad.

Yes, that may be so.

That is why I commented, to educate myself on what I did not know, and what I thought it was about.

People that know or are confident in opposing what I say will hopefully teach me a different point of view.

Politicians were pushing for censorship in social media.

Matt Taibbi writes on this.

Munk Debate - Mainstream Media ft. Douglas Murray, Matt Taibbi, Malcolm Gladwell, Michelle Goldberg [1:40:24 | Truthspeak (YT channel)] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nvaf7XOOFHc

It seems you pointed something out, but failed to explain your thought process.

What did I miss?

Do you think the same of leaks done by journalists of how our military functions?

Your comment does not help, you should have tried to use sentences to help educate me or to state your thinking process.

Did you not read all of my response.

Consistency is required when looking at the problems we have.

This is happenong to Musk, but the same happens to people on the left.

Smears happen without proof, just for going against the status quo.

This seems to be a smear for not siding with Israel, and calling for peace.

Your response does not help make your point, it does the opposite.

I am not sure what you are trying to get across.

Reminds me of Trump derangement syndrome.

Again, we have enough to bash Musk as is, no need to lie or make up things.

Yes, but this article seems to be a smear of MSM.

Due to not siding with Israel and instead talking of ceasefire or peace, same with Ukraine/Russia.

Looking at the talk he had with Lex Fridman.

This is a win for the status quo bloods and crips.

To me, there is a lot to bash Musk on, but the twitter files confirmed and should have enlightened many of the problems we currently have with politicians/media/corporations being in bed with each other.

This seems similar to the Russiagate stories pushed by legacy media.

Smearing opposition of the status quo, then once the population believes the lies, the truth starts to comes out years later by MSM journalists.

I make mistakes and I am willing to learn, so please if anyone can articulate and explain in detail?

Why all the baseless hate against Musk, while we already know enough about how he treats his workers to be against him. No need to be hostile or to lie when talking about him.

Ah, okay.

Thanks!