these apps do not use any official API. if they used it, they would be obliged to comply with the terms of services that most likely force them to show ads or track the users or some other bullshit.

of course these unofficial viewers break from time to time, but in my experience they have been super quick releasing patches fixing it and the user experience is way way better than the official web or app. Fast UI without bloat, no ads, no algorithms, etc.

yeah, I do not agree with a lot of the guy’s opinions, but I respect that instead of playing ball with Apple he took his phone and read his own speech.

it’s too much of a coincidence that the removed parts were the most controversial ones. that’s a pretty weird change for allegedly an “older draft version”.

additionally, it’s not the first time Apple has removed controversial topics in a short period of time. I might not agree with DeNiro at all, but I’m convinced that those parts of the script were removed purposefully by Apple.

I honestly don’t care what the guy had to say. Removing parts from his speech without telling him is plain awful.

Physical records make good money for the artists, if it weren’t for the greedy discographies of course.

Ethernet is an standard. as long as standards are open (and they should be, by definition) they can’t die as long as there is an use for them.

poor people can’t enjoy art now? what you’re proposing is artificially creating an economic barrier to access art just because you consider that people who are born in developing countries aren’t interested in art.

also, there are a tons of people who buy android phones even if they can afford an iPhone because Apple’s devices are a golden jail.

I doubt the one that they display in their website is a terabyte, because that would require a ton of traffic just to get the render in the browser for each visitor they get.

(I’m sure that isn’t the full resolution one, but it still looks pretty good)

I’ll buy a framework when they finally add the Coreboot support they promised.

I’m guessing that it isn’t. So don’t use it.

this does not affect Google, Meta or any other Big Tech at all. This law was trying to break encryption or do some sort of client side scanning. And it didn’t got approved.

This does not force Google or Meta to encrypt your chats if they weren’t doing so. Or to remove their own backdoors in the encryption if they had them. It’s just a law that was not passed. So your comment does not make any sense.

PS: it’s not like Google or Meta care too much about encrypting the contents. They’ll happily take your metadata which is super valuable. This is what Meta does with WhatsApp.

If indie devs, for example, aren’t getting the same deal, it sounds anticompetitive to me.

(I’m no Epic fan, just a random thought)

C’mon, I specifically told that I deleted my comments because I didn’t want to discuss it and you response to that by bringing it up again?

I only commented again because OP accused me of harassing him, which I’m not doing. I’m not interested in talking about the video or Rossmann at all, because it’s just a waste of my time.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

not at all. It’s a proprietary app.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator