- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
1·3 years agodeleted by creator
That’s why adblock wanted to by default allow not annoying ads, but there was a big backlash and other adblockers became more popular like ublock
There are also Firefox forks, but you have to install apk manually and then extension are easy to download without developer collection
Google is very smart with ad prices because they are actually not constant. Advertisers have bots that bid how much they want to pay for an ad, determining based on user data how much it’s worth for them, and if your bot wins, your ad is shown. That’s why if some advertiser decides to pay a lot to a lot of user groups, the same freaking ads are being shown to you all the time
I can’t blame them for wanting to restore monetization as adblockers removed most of the revenue from those platforms. But fighting adblockers is not a way to do this. They should either change entire YouTube business model to pay to access, or rework ads to be less annoying. If ads were not annoying as fuck, people wouldn’t be pushed to install adblock in the first place. Adblock became popular when video ads with sound started popping up on the websites. This includes video ads in YouTube videos, people just hate to watch video ads.
knowing EU they would be against and just add a rule that every app should have ability to opt out in EU in like 2 years :D
Considering his recent behavior, I think he already tried it
The problem is that between gpt 3 and 4 there is massive increase in number of parameters, but not massive increase in its abilities