I remember in 2015 there were images circulating after a debate claiming Hillary Clinton was wearing an earpiece, despite the pictures used as proof clearly being from a different event.
I remember in 2015 there were images circulating after a debate claiming Hillary Clinton was wearing an earpiece, despite the pictures used as proof clearly being from a different event.
It’s because it was from Davis. He interrupted her constantly, including times when she was about to tell him it was his turn to talk. He didn’t interrupt Muir almost at all.
I’ll leave the reason why he interrupted one and not the other as an exercise for the reader.
No, he was saying that she “put out a statement” about her racial identity.
He dodged every question and shoehorned in “the border” for all of them.
Here’s the thing: you’re not wrong on what each side seems to have as priorities. It’s just absurd that anyone should think there’s any kind of equivalence between them.
That’s the way we do things lads, we’re making shit up as we wish!
Every one of those companies would probably be doing better without his involvement, so that might be a positive for them…
Doctor Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog has a commentary track called Commentary! The Musical! It is exactly what it sounds like, and it’s hilarious.
I guess you could say it was…whale done.
A hard g? Like in giraffe?
Who didn’t have an election?
I suppose I shouldn’t be looking for meaning in anything he says.
Probably not an issue with the bot itself, but just FYI, it appears the spoiler tags don’t work on Boost.
Not only that, but according to the Bible, life begins at the first breath taken after birth. Also according to the Bible, the punishment for injuring a woman and causing her to miscarry is the same as for loss of property, which is dramatically different from the punishment for murder.
Kinda takes the wind out of the “abortion is murder” argument, from a biblical perspective, at least.
Electronic components. Almost all small parts shops are gone.
I know it’s technically different, but in both cases you have a person who has lived in the US for most of their life, and is for all intents and purposes an American, but who is not, due to a technicality, a citizen. It is extremely similar.
No, he wasn’t “pretending” to be a citizen, he was a citizen. They’ve just now decided his citizenship was granted in error, and so he now is no longer a citizen.
No, he was a US citizen at the time. They’ve revoked his citizenship now because they said it shouldn’t have been granted, but that doesn’t mean he wasn’t ever a citizen. It means he was before, but is not now.
Not that rare, this is a very similar situation to what the DREAM Act was trying to resolve. As of last year, there were more than 500,000 people who qualified.
…have you been paying attention? They’ve already been fucking with private enterprise. All that matters to them is the culture war. They’ve completely dropped the pretense that they’re about business.
The only reason this happens is because our system is so weird. In every other country, funding is automatic and doesn’t need to be authorized separately. The fix is to switch to a similar setup. Of course, that will never happen, as it would take away this bludgeon the GOP uses to try to get its way.