

Yea every network may do things differently… in my case tcp/443 openvpn is blocked at several places that I frequent.
Yea every network may do things differently… in my case tcp/443 openvpn is blocked at several places that I frequent.
I assume this is because, in addition to the missing ciphers as referenced in the linked article, OpenVPN, even though it uses TLS, it initially uses a very identifiable handshake before initiating TLS, which is not hard to block. I have personally had problems specifically with OpenVPN being targeted/blocked in this way.
did you read the article?
Well… like Bill Clinton said, it depends on what the definition of “is” is.
I have the feeling that limiting yourself to Gemini would guarantee you basically only ever communicate with the weirdest of the weird.
Basically instead of launching completely new processes for each tab, which uses the (now updated/different) binary on disk, it uses a small secondary process that stays running the whole time the browser is open, and new processes are forked from that one, which makes them all use the same in-memory copy of the old process even after the program is updated.
This only works on *nix because you can’t overwrite binaries on Windows that are in use… but Linux keeps the old binary in memory the whole time, so it doesn’t care if you replace it, as it won’t be used until you restart the program.
So it doesn’t actually update anything at all while it’s running.
Will this stop the constant crashing I’ve been having the last several versions?
Did you read the article?
If I don’t know what your code is doing, and I can’t modify it, I don’t want it.
To be fair, 99% of the world population do not share this viewpoint.
I don’t understand how/why this got so popular out of nowhere… the same solution has already existed for years in the form of haproxy-protection and a couple others… but nobody seems to care about those.
That and if you go on the gnome forums, their attitude IMO seems openly hostile to… almost everything and everyone.
Who was denied entry for not having social media?
4chan. they call each other anon all the time
will be denied entry
Source:
I said I will take it, not that I think everyone else should, or is capable of recognizing/ignoring conspiracy theories. I struggle much harder with ignoring bad attitudes than I do obvious bullshit, but to each their own.
Banned elements @lemmy.world from the community Veganism@lemmy.ca reason: unknown new user signal group link spam
tbf I’ll take Dale Gribble level conspiracy theories over Linus’ bad attitude any day.
They actually do. To quote a major FOSS developer, “popularity is not a project goal.”
Reminds me of early punk rockers that get upset when their tiny little nobody band that fits in their back pocket, gets too big to fit in their pocket anymore. Some might call it “selling out.”
deleted by creator