You could begin with “summary:”

Your comment reads more like a rebuttal than a summary. If you intend to summarize the article for lazy lemmings, that’s cool, but present it as such.

The article already says everything you said. It’s not a “solution” to anything. It’s a small step to show that this is even possible. Perhaps it will help some people whose condition makes them extraordinarily sensitive.

I swear people will find a way to shit on virtually anything and turn absolutely everything into class war.

It’s the same phenomenon as “LGBTQI+”

It was literally LGB at one point. I understand the concept of inclusion but I think pursuing it by appending and appending and appending is a lousy way to go. I believe the “Q” was finally added in part because it was hoped to be some kind of catch-all, but that didn’t work.

I know there are more important things to say about this receipt, but since everyone has already said them:

Wow, look at that receipt. So simple. Actual ink on actual paper. No coupons on the back. And one line per item. No “price - savings = real price!” bullshit or anything else. I long for that kind of simplicity in even the little things in life.

The guy’s closing on 80 and is widely purported to be incontinent. Now ask yourself if he is willing to risk someone seeing his little piggly wiggly dick smeared with his own shit and unable to get hard. I think we’d be flattering him to imagine he’s out there banging away.

All because Trump pressured the rest of NATO and wants more money they signed an agreement promising to do so.

The only cock warmer Donald is capable of is the piss he takes in his diaper every 140 minutes.

If it stars out enshittified then you never had anything to enshittify, just plain shit.

Melania was expected to do something with it and she had no interest. This reflected poorly on her in a lot of people’s expectations, and so the two of them were like “fuck the rose garden.” End of story. The Trumps will never have class so they figure no one else can either.

Seriously. We’re supposed to regard Iran as an existential threat that is worth any price to neutralize. Okay, boomers.

Is it in the room right now?

And everyone else.

Pfff I stopped waiting. We have already seen that they will ignore logic and the evidence of their own eyes to imagine that they are winning even as the guillotine begins to slice through their neck.

I wish we could just assume you are being sarcastic but Acellerationism is a philosophy some with actual power hold quite seriously.

Now we’re saying that it’s ethical to join the military because they’ll pay for you to have a baby. Is that really a serious argument?

Your comment was unintelligible, sorry. I can hear you whining now, very clearly, and trying to insult me personally. So I guess you can communicate successfully when you try.

No it fucking ain’t.

Well, that settles it. Who can argue with this kind of airtight logic?

Your post is unnecessarily hostile and offers nothing, son. I’ve worked at the same place for 8 years now, probably longer than you’ve been out of diapers, and yes, working alongside people does form a bond. If you’ve ever had to cooperate with someone, trust someone, get through difficulties with someone, you’d know all this. But from the way you enjoy flinging obscenities at strangers I doubt you have much experience forming bonds with people, period.

Oh, you’re one of those fucking extroverts.

And here’s the part where I just laugh in your face.

Try reformulating your question in English and I’ll see if I can answer you.

I’m being generous. I mean the revolutionary and civil wars weren’t exactly imperialism. But you’re right there are older examples to be sure. Like what we did to Mexico.