forgotten

I would not.

Ah, stupid me, obviously you have a nuclear reactor, what would you do else with loads on nuclear waste from the accelerators.

A bit more mathematically depth of field is roughly proportional to lambda/(NA)^2, where lambda is the wavelength (we are not doing monochromatic illumination, but it still holds regardless) and NA is the numerical aperture, in photography context you may know of something called f-number which is related but not same. basically both are ratios of size of aperture (Diameter) and distance of object, to be precise f number is the ratio, and NA is n (refractive index of medium in between, which is usually air, so 1) times sin of above ratio. long story short, basically as Diameter increases, this NA increases, and depth of field becomes shorter.

For a explanation of why this happens is a bit harder to hand wavily explain, but i will try.

firstly some jargon lingo - spatial frequency - consider it as frequency of something in source, the smaller the features in the source, larger as these frequency.

also for now just take it, larger aperture helps capture larger spatial frequency (if you want to know math about it, your aperture is basically a circ function (the name called in literature) (1 inside aperture, and 0 outside, as in blocking anything outside) and mathematically it gets multiplied (or to be precise, we actulally have convolution (Assume some fancy multiplication), and for larger spatial frequency, jinc (a complimentary fucntion of circ) becomes small) - yada yada - we loose small features with small apertures)

but above math also tells you that for larger aperture, depth of field is poorer. So Imaging is a balancing game of figuring out how to have your aperture, if you can manage with poorer depth of field, you get better “resolution” and vice versa.

If you want to publish, please do 2 things - find a publisher which does not necessitate exclusivity (as in, you do not necessarily have to just publish something on there portal) - and secondly, make a portal of your own, and publich a duplicate copy there. This serves 2 purposes, if someone really wants to follow your work, they can just follow your website, and in case a future bait and switch happens, you have a backup of all your work.

If you want to publish, please do 2 things - find a publisher which does not necessitate exclusivity (as in, you do not necessarily have to just publish something on there portal) - and secondly, make a portal of your own, and publich a duplicate copy there. This serves 2 purposes, if someone really wants to follow your work, they can just follow your website, and in case a future bait and switch happens, you have a backup of all your work.

Best of luck for the electricity bills

most don’t, most will just give you poisoning from ingestion (or plain old indigestion), or in off case cancers, but that is not “kill” enough

probably spend about billion dollars to make some particle accelerators, or ask some existing lab to let you move all your stuff into there lab, since ognassen would not last for even a second (all nearby elements are basically same in this, ognassen being most stable), so you would have to move your collection to their lab to have a “complete” set

if he had astatine, more like 20 mins

Back in my day, we had 20 amino acids and we were happy.

But seriously, what are the other 2, I am presuming we are counting seleno-cystine? and i checked for the other one I had completely forgotten - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrolysine

could you bother to share some tips, like the perfect brand to get the anti aging vaccines from, or that super duper bone density improvement kit. The brands i have been looking at at really expensive, the last one i tried was asking 127 quintillion, plus taxes. PLUS TAXES! those cheapskates

don’t upload directly to lemmy, use some other image hosting. to cut on costs, lemmy servers can either have (adjustable) file size limits, or (optionally) compress the image

I did try, but they are not that, lets just say helpful, because I am switching my specialisation, and they say what i currently seeking is more of a fad (it is not, but the are relatively old school folks)

Devil: I must say I am a big fan

This picture definitely says more than 1000 words

One thing that would quickly start to happen is a lot of the smaller countries would either be forcefully taken over or be quieted down. Most countries have neighbours they do not share good relations with - and with nuclear armament - bigger of 2 could easily pose nuclear threat and have a much bigger say in their arguments. This could mean taking over contested/disputed lands or some kind of minearl deals being forcefully signed. Soon the total world country count would start to decrease purely because of this (annd would actually accelerate until a point where most countries would form coallitions with some nuclear power and sum total of power on both (or all sides in general) be roughly comparable such that no one poses a greater threat to another and not have an equal threat back at them.

Do not overthink simple things - one spends a lot of time finding answers to things they were already sitting upon. If you are not happy with who you are today - then try to find what is it that makes you unhappy, and try to fix it, that is, if it is something fixable. Somethings can not be fixed, and sometimes are better left as is, or sometimes, you can learn to embrace them.

My guess is our brains are hyper plastic at that age - new connections keep forming - and total number of neurons does not really increase. So either the the number of connections per neuron increases (this can only happen to certain extent, due to surface area and nearest number constraints - basically you can not arrange a lot of things close enough to have a stonger bond) or you can have connections rewired (break somewhere, and form somewhere else). And my guess is that latter is prefered beyond a certain point - most of activities of babies is sleeping or basic interactions with outside world, and maybe our brain prefers to keep the basic understanding of the world in memory (maybe because that would be revisited the most).

Particularly for electric cars - you have very inflamable lithium batteris, which when spiked very hard (by something sharp), so multiple layers short circuit and well short circuits leads to fire. But batteries are at the bottom of the body, with few easily exposed areas (otherwise they would be at risk of explosions all time). I do not know what people are doing exactly, but you can use a crowbar like thing to hit the beneath posterior, until you expose the battery, and then 1 or 2 hits can do it, or you can skip this and use a smaller conventional explosive.

I would like to add this - I do not condone arson. Even if anyone wants to protest - this is not the way to do it, unless you burn your own stuff, then you are only harming environment. What i wrote is purely for educational purposes.