i should be gripping rat

  • 258 Posts
  • 603 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle








  • Yeah I’m right there with you. we are the 22% of US game players that are not directly discussed in this article, the ones that are price sensitive but still buying games on a semi-regular basis. Mat Piscatella suggests that it’s that most frequent 14% at the top that are propping up the legacy industry these days, and he’s probably right. I’m inclined to believe that those of us in the next 22% still account for a decent chunk, but more and more of us are shifting towards spending money on live service games only. Idk how some people can afford to spend money on every new game as they come out, that cohort must be almost entirely wealthy folks at this point.






  • Usually this sort of contract only applies for the term of the subscription, and then the company can change whatever they like at the end of that term.

    The article even specifies that the grandfathered plan only continues to exist because Microsoft is “allowing” it.

    When asked, an Xbox spokesperson did not confirm how long legacy Console subscriptions will remain active for current subscribers.

    So I get what you are saying, but in this specific case, there is no legal reason why Microsoft could not force current subscribers to move to one of the new, more expensive plans. They are just being nice to some of their most loyal users, for some reason.