Is it generic? It seems pretty rich in Elden Ring when compared to most games.

Because he’d say no. Better to ask for forgiveness.

The PS5, while bigger than last entries, is hardly the size of a small fridge.

More like a floor air conditioner.

The main thing I want from ES6 is the same level of modability as Skyrim. I’d love for it to be as stable as Starfield.

I didn’t think the need to dump creation to make a great game, they just need to stop trying to polish the rust. Some aspects of Creation aren’t amazing but the staying power of Bethesda games has been about modding a compelling world in a well supported way. They need to ensure that whatever they do that they don’t lose that.

I think Starfield has a lot going for it but I don’t find the world compelling enough to want to spend time in the way I did Skyrim. I enjoyed the time I did spend but I don’t see that itch coming back. Starfield made me want to play a space game with magic, but I’ve I got it’s magic unlocked I didn’t feel that desire was fulfilled.

Considering they are getting through the whole trilogy I’m guessing it’s probably more background noise during work or something.

They are very indie. I had only heard of one of their games, Lugaru, before today.

They seem to be getting better at making games, but they still look to be visually lacking.

I’m going to stop. Your over confidence is preventing you from listening to anything.

Forking doesn’t imply control. A forked version of chromium would still want to keep up to date with the upstream project.

You seem to view this public option with an unrealistic view of how software development works. Especially in the public sector.

Somebody comes in with a requirement to do something in the fastest and cheapest way possible. In this case, make a public browser option. The engineers go off and fork chromium and simply reskin it because that meets the brief. They might even go so far as to set up a CI pipeline that auto pulls new features from upstream.

The public sector isn’t going to be interested in trying to make the optimal browser if they are forced to create one. They are going to be interested in meeting the brief in the fastest and easiest way possible.

This. For bg3 I started by looking up a simple question around class complexity. Landed on fighter for my first class and then only looked up specific questions I had about how something works if I wanted to consider it.

That was only to verify I understood what it was saying it did correctly.

I’ll get even more specific to what is likely to happen in that scenario. The governmental entity will reskin chromium. Google will own the open source project.

Your arguments are all over the place. It’s not the governments responsibility to ensure that a law suit is profitable.

And a new browser isn’t going to do what you think it is. Any attempt by a government to create a browser is just going to use Blink anyways. The reason so many browsers are using it (including browsers made by tech giants) is that rendering engines are incredibly difficult to maintain. Especially as the Web continues to evolve.

Yes, these things are inconvenient. Meaning they are achievable items but at some personal cost and effort. They are not insurmountable.

And a new browser isn’t going to change anything. I’m honestly not even sure what you’re arguing anymore.

I think you’re struggling with the difference of convenience and difficulty. Doing things without the web implies you are going to do them in the same way you’d have to pre-web. That makes the web more convenient.

I can walk in to the library of Congress and make a face to face request.

The web is a convenience for any public need in the US.

That sounds like your government has an issue. That isn’t the same as governments as a whole using the web.

In the US, we still have the option to do things in person. The online presence is a convenience. That’s how it should work everywhere.

I think an important factor is how the host treats the misinformation. If they push back on it, you know they aren’t inviting those people due to agreement.

Real time with Bill Maher has people of all sorts of perspectives on but he usually actively debates against positions he disagrees with.

There’s lots of valid criticism of the guy but he at least tries to his ability to present a fair argument.

If you don’t feel like misinformation is being called out on that site then it may be questionable. Don’t shy away from a content creator just for having questionable guests. Turn them off because you don’t like how they handle those guests.

In principle, if a government is going to distribute content to the public, they also have a duty to equip the public to be able to consume the content. Telling people to come up with their own private sector tools to reach the public sector is a bit off.

This statement is a rearrangement of events. The governments of the world didn’t create an online presence and then tell the private sector to create browsers. Governments joined in an already existing method of communication because it was convenient, popular, and browsers already existed to view the content.

My immediate thought when I saw somebody confused by how they got so many packages was “did they install node?”

The only red flags in a real relationship are how you treat the other person and yourself. Don’t put dating on a pedestal. It’s just 2 people hanging out and getting to know one another.

It’s not the same for everybody. Some people find lots of success with apps. Others meet people at social events. Some meet at work. Just be yourself around people and pay attention to who you jive with on a personal level.

Weight shouldn’t be a problem. The reality is that everybody has things they are attracted to and for some people weight can be a factor. Only loose weight for your own happiness, though. Don’t do it to attract a partner because that’s not a good way to maintain a lifestyle change and your own happiness is paramount with changes like that.

Where is the nearest fire to dump this comment in?