They failed to predict voter sentiment so obviously they’re right about the voters being at fault.

I don’t think we were financing loans with GPUs as collateral back in 2012 or 2016: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/11/04/silicon-valley-and-wall-street-invent-collateralized-gpu-obligations-surely-this-will-work-out-fine/

Big difference between this and 2016 is JD Vance is the adult, not Mike Pence. His ties to Peter Thiel is scary. Also we just had a billionaire buy votes, no way that is going to stop now.

Markets are cyclic and we’re overdue for the AI bubble to pop. But I don’t think that automatically means the Democrats can win another presidential election or win the Senate.

You might be on to something in the sense that coming back with a more inclusive response is a better approach. I don’t think that makes them “right” though.

He will do half of what he said he would and say that is proof he was joking.

Not if your single issue is preserving democracy ^___

But you see, they are smart because they have lots of money. /s

Somehow it worked, I don’t understand how though

Do you like cram the night before a test as well? I’ve been watching his interviews and rallies intently up till now, I don’t understand this desire to procrastinate homework while talking like you did the assignment.

Just because someone failed to rob a bank doesn’t mean they aren’t a bank robber.

The rich do nothing about a problem by default.

Well you can’t take the effect and make it the cause

Maybe she disagrees with “who needs their opinions changed”.

Now I wonder if he’s been abusing something and his wife got a few licks in…

Who wants to vote swap with me? I’ll write in Refaat Alareer if someone votes Kamala in a swing state. I’m in California so don’t tell me I’d be wasting my vote.

“It’s just a joke bro, they aren’t even a race” made me chuckle. The best part was doubling down at the end that it’s really America that’s racist. Great satire, even if unintentional.

You know that is actually insightful to the PTSD that many IDF soldiers are experiencing.

According to international law it’s acceptable when you’re being occupied, as is the case with Palestine. Not saying I agree, but the law makes a big distinction for those under apartheid.

I mean it was wrong when the US bombed weddings in the middle east and was a bad look. Don’t even need hypotheticals.

population centers

Why does one side have population centers and the other human shields? It’s wrong regardless.