Flying Squid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoCongressman ‘Caught on Camera’ Pulling Fire Alarm to in Apparent Attempt to Delay Vote to Avoid Shutdownwww.mediaite.comexternal-linkmessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1775arrow-down138
arrow-up1737arrow-down1external-linkCongressman ‘Caught on Camera’ Pulling Fire Alarm to in Apparent Attempt to Delay Vote to Avoid Shutdownwww.mediaite.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squarethepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDid you not read the quote and source I provided that shows that I am correct?
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYou read it wrong. You may not falsely shout fire in a crowded theater. You obviously don’t have a lot of experience reading legal cases. It’s okay.
minus-squarethepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI did not read it wrong. It clearly states that the 69 case narrowed the scope so shouting fire in a crowded theater is no longer unprotected.
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt doesn’t say that and that isn’t true. The first case didn’t involve a defendant who falsely shouted fire in a crowded theater.
Did you not read the quote and source I provided that shows that I am correct?
You read it wrong. You may not falsely shout fire in a crowded theater. You obviously don’t have a lot of experience reading legal cases. It’s okay.
I did not read it wrong. It clearly states that the 69 case narrowed the scope so shouting fire in a crowded theater is no longer unprotected.
It doesn’t say that and that isn’t true. The first case didn’t involve a defendant who falsely shouted fire in a crowded theater.