A page from The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes - and Why by Amanda Ripley

I guess it’s not exactly surprising, but it seems to explain a lot of things I’m witnessing in my later adulthood. I’ve always felt deeply impressed by selfless heroes, but I never really pondered the profile of heroism.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    But… I’m confused. Didn’t Musk call empathy a weakness? Surely someone so tolerant, inclusive, and humble couldn’t be wrong.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fucking hell. I can’t escape being reminded of this shitstain everywhere, even if I filter political posts.

      • Photuris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        A parasite keeps reminding you it’s there until it (or you) is destroyed.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          programming.dev##article.comment-node:has(div.comment-content:has(p:has-text(/Musk/i)))

          Put that into your adblocker custom filters (assuming you’re using a browser)

        • dickalan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, I heard ignoring the shit world around you is a really good way to effect change

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I tried to effect change for 8 years. I gave up when Americans decided that they wanted the shit world. My mental health can’t handle it, I literally am losing years of my life with every moment I spend reading about how the people in this country are hell bent on turning it into the worst possible existence.

            • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              We were in this position before, a period of even greater division, even to the point of violence.

              Our mistake was not teaching the fascist confederates the price of evil.

          • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s about as effective as talking about it on social media all day, every day. The people making real change are out in the real world doing concrete things - not just posting about it online. Shaming people for not wanting to be miserable 24/7 because of the constant firehose of bad news isn’t just unproductive - it’s counterproductive.

      • PineRune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Cover your eyes, plug your ears, and ignore the cries of those suffering around you.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          As opposed to passing drivel on the web even where it’s completely unrelated, because that solves all problems.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Choosing to filter out political content from your social media feed isn’t necessarily about denial or apathy. For many people, it’s a conscious decision to preserve their mental clarity and avoid being constantly pulled into emotionally charged, tribal, or manipulative discourse. Being well-informed doesn’t require immersing yourself in an endless stream of outrage, nor does stepping back from that mean you’re turning a blind eye to anything.

          There’s a difference between ignoring reality and choosing how and when to engage with it. Most of what passes for political content online isn’t a sober presentation of facts or ideas - it’s performance, manufactured outrage, and algorithm-driven noise. If someone wants to stay sane and focus on things they can actually influence in their immediate life, I don’t see that as sticking their head in the sand. I see it as setting healhy boundaries in an environment that’s often designed to provoke rather than inform.

          People aren’t morally obligated to be constantly exposed to negativity just to prove they care. In fact, thoughtful action tends to come from those who can step back from the noise and think clearly, not from those who are perpetually consumed by it.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Paul Bloom has written an entire book arguing Against Empathy

      I’m not sure I entirely agree with his thesis but it’s not a completely outrageous idea. I often wish I could tone down my level of empathy as well.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Reading the page, it doesn’t sound like he’s against empathy at all. He’s specifically against making decisions based on “feels” and targeting empathy specifically because he seems to believe it’s a tool often misused.

        For a second I was expecting something akin to Radical Candor’s “ruinous empathy” which has been used an excuse by managers the world over to justify their inherent lack of any empathy for the people around them.

        Seems like an interesting read, adding it to my list. Thanks.

      • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I got caught up on the term ‘empathy for self.’ I haven’t read the book, but I visited the link and couldn’t get past what I felt was a tragically flawed oxymoron. But maybe that’s a flaw with the Wikipedia article and not the source material, so I’ll endeavor to seek out the book at some point to learn more.