• ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I didn’t know it was possible for everyone to simply intend for their body to engage or not engage in such a bodily function. Interesting. /s

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, honestly, screw the meme reply, what the absolute holy hell is “the intention of holding eggs” in your body?

      I mean, pretty sure that covers a whole bunch of trans women and decidedly not a whole bunch of cis women, but that’s besides the point. What did she mean?

      I fear there is a whole pseudoscientific terfy rabbit hole behind this and I don’t want to fall down that hole, but I kinda need to know if it’s a slip of the tongue or what.

      • Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s just regular misogyny this time, in that they only see “real” women as capable of giving birth, and then tried to cover up medical problems that would get in the way of that with the word “intention”.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          There are fights where wonen say you are a “real” mother only if you popped it out through the vagina, so no c-section.

          Some people have so little to be proud about I guess 🤷🏼‍♀️