• lukini@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why is only one relevant? Is it the brutality of the war that matters? Or the recency?

    • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because those Tribes are not currently benefiting from the land they took. And most likely are in the same boat if they still exist.

    • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No reason to not give you the benefit of the doubt, but you’re giving off heavy “they were already killing each other so it’s no big deal” vibes. No insult intended, just what I’m picking up.

      Intertribal conflict is the tribes’ business, colonizing and displacing is colonists’ business. To be clear, external invasion is the concern here