• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Never really seen my wife angrier than when we watched the special edition for the first time and Hayden popped up at the end.

    I think her exact words were “what the fuck is he doing there?”

    We only watch the 4K83 version now.

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ma Be honest, when I was a Kid this scene really confused me, Who is the old Guy? Why is he here? What did I miss? It wasn’t until I was older I realized JarJar was a Sith.

    • Zanathos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s 4K83 different than the despecialized? I have the 720p versions but if they’ve gone beyond that then I need to reeducate myself.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Mostly colour grading, I think.

        Only downside to 4K77 is the grain in the desert scenes, where they clearly used dogshit stock.

      • vaguerant@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The 4K trilogy (4K77, 4K80 and 4K83) are original theatrical film scans by enthusiasts. Where Despecialized manually recreated the originals by using multiple sources to restore changed scenes, the scans are just that. The results are ultimately very similar.

        The main advantage to Despecialized is that it uses the official 4K Blu-Rays as its source for anything that doesn’t need restoring, so it’s mostly a professional quality transfer, while the 4K trilogy were scanned and cleaned up by fans. The main disadvantage is obviously that Despecialized is not a “real” theatrical cut while 4K is.

        Either will probably satisfy somebody who wants to watch the unmodified orig trig.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I recently procured the OT as well, and of course it’s the version with ass looking CGI Lucas threw in afterwards. However i don’t mind the additional scenes, is there a sort of compromise cut that tries to keep the additional content yet avoids the glaring CGI? Hayden for example I don’t mind. Controversial take, I know.

            • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              40 minutes ago

              The whole CGI jabba can get lost, but I had hoped for something that preserves the dialogue in some way. Not sure what I had in mind lol

  • gws@programming.dev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gandalf the Grey and Gandalf the White
    And Monty Python and the Holy Grail’s black knight
    And Benito Mussolini and the Blue Meanie
    And Cowboy Curtis and Jambi the Genie
    Robocop, The Terminator, Captain Kirk, and Darth Vader
    Lo-pan, Superman, every single Power Ranger
    Bill S. Preston and Theodore Logan
    Spock, The Rock, Doc Ock, and Hulk Hogan

  • AtariDump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If I got this right from l to r:

    •The Groundhog (from either Groundhog’s Day or Caddyshack)
    •Ted & Bill
    •RoboCop
    •The Indian Chief from Ernest Goes to Camp

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wait, is that what the controversy is all about? They just updated the character with the new actor?

    I thought it was more about them putting Vader as redeemable.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Vader was always there, it was just a matter of him being changed from the original actor to Hayden Christensen because he was more recognizable.

      But in context, it doesn’t seem to make much sense. Why does Darth Vader age down, while Obi Wan is still Alec Guinness instead of Ewan McGregor? If it’s supposed to be reflective of the last time he was “good”, why isn’t it him at the moment he decided to save his son and kill the Emperor?

    • vaguerant@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a couple of things people who don’t like it criticize. For one, the Christensen footage is from an early test for Revenge of the Sith, so he’s just weirdly glowering at the camera because he wasn’t thinking about this moment when it was filmed. That’s also why it’s just Hayden’s head comped onto Sebastian Shaw’s body.

      Then there’s obviously the question of … why Hayden Christensen at all? The implication is that the “real” Anakin Skywalker died decades ago and was replaced by Darth Vader, which kind of runs counter to the idea that he was ultimately redeemed by his love for his son as presented in the original cut.

      Then you’ve got the fact that it kind of makes the original trilogy nonsensical in standalone. If you come to Star Wars and watch 4-5-6 first, there’s some random guy you don’t know at the end. It forces you to watch at least 1-2 and probably 3 first, or do something wacky like the Machete order (4-5-2-3-6), just so that the ending makes sense.

      If you haven’t figured it out yet, I don’t like it myself. But I don’t care because I’ve got the Despecialized editions, so Maclunkey it up.

      • Druid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What’s the point of the machete order? Is 2-3 interspersed before 6 like a flashback or something?

        • vaguerant@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yeah, exactly. The goal is to preserve the reveal of Darth Vader’s real identity. If you just watch them in number order, the prequels spoiler the original trilogy. With the Machete order, you get the Vader reveal in Empire, then a “flashback” that explains how it happened.

          Skipping Phantom Menace is just because the guy who came up with the Machete order didn’t like it and felt you got enough context from 2-3. But you can do roughly the same thing without skipping it by just going 4-5-1-2-3-6.

          • Druid@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Interesting and actually makes a lot of sense. Though I’m not sure how many would actually benefit from that order outside new, younger Star Wars fans since everyone knows the reveal. Still a cool concept.

            Disservice to my favourite one of them, Phantom Menace, but I get it. It’s just not really important in the grant scheme of things. It’s definitely got the coolest final fight imo, outside maybe RotS.

            • Stovetop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              For what it’s worth, the machete order has been a thing for a long while now, but it was only more recently that the prequel trilogy was somewhat “redeemed” when the politicking became a lot more applicable and relatable to those earlier audiences who were likely very bored of it all as teenagers/young adults.

              I would say the Phantom Menace is seen as a better movie today than it was back then, even though it’s a slow burn to get started, because it shows the early stages of a collapsing democracy that underlies the events of the following two movies. Everything is weighed down by bureaucracy, there are minor conflicts which escalate into something larger, people turning a blind eye to injustices like slavery, etc.

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wait, is that what the controversy is all about?

      The internet. Star Wars fans. Millennials.

      Pick one.

        • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          My brother. Millennials were literally responsible for ruining Jake Lloyd’s life. Those entitled cunts have a lot to answered for.l

          • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Actually he said in a relatively recent interview that his mother shielded him from the backlash. He didn’t see any of it until decades later. In the meantime he battled very serious mental health issues that were unrelated to Star Wars.

            But Star Wars fans could almost claim responsibility for the suicide of Ahmed Best. He acted the shit out of Jar Jar and only earned hate for it.

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          By my grandfather’s Betamax, Star Wars (IV) does not contain a scene with Jabba the Hutt, and there’s no extra ring when the Death Star explodes, plus all the other nonsense additions.

          As a kid in the 80’s I watched the trilogy on tapes recorded OTA, and got annoyed when the fouled DVD releases started showing up.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hey! Nerds! There is ONE Star Wars movie! Only one!

    You can waste time with your ridiculous fan fiction when your chores are done.