• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s the first time I hear systemd […] were spelling the death of […] linux

    Where’ve you been? We’ve been expressing concern about its badly-built badly-architected metastatic creep for a decade of dwindling choice and competition as it slowly forced out dissent and clued concern.

    Now it’s eaten autofs, DNS, cron, NTPd, and replaced them with shitty clones, and has carefully eroded our ability to recover from this mess.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      First, I said “the init process”. The systemd project reinventing the wheel at every occasion is half garbage half “yeah, it’s not horrible, but we’re going to iron it out again for the next decades” level of horror. You won’t have to convince me of that. And don’t get me started on “binary” logs that sometimes takes dozen of seconds to just show up when requested. But the management of services is an overall improvement over scripts stitched together.

      I’m well aware of these discussions.

      But systemd management, and overall presence, is not something most people would care about. From a user perspective, the system boots, and things works (mostly). To non admin user, running a systemd system or a sysvinit system or whatever is irrelevant.

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yes. But none of that is in the way of “the Linux desktop”. A more unified system with less modules and components (you know, like systemd being a solution to everything) is actually beneficial for wide spread adoption.

      People hate systemd for design and philosophy but not because it keeps new people from adopting Linux.