It only lowers the value if you don’t blanketdly shield AI from lawsuits just because “AI” or “LLM”. There needs to be a higher bar before you can consider the input “transformed” otherwise it will continue to be abused in the laziest/cheapest way possible
It means loading copyrighted material into your training data does not inherently absolve you of copyright liability, otherwise there’s no reason not to have chatgpt spit out full Dr Suess books if you ask for a story.
There is a lot of disinformation being spread, maybe to influence juries, or maybe to undermine the already beleaguered rule of law in the US. The truth is that there is very little unexpected about these judgments. That’s how fair use works.
It only lowers the value if you don’t blanketdly shield AI from lawsuits just because “AI” or “LLM”. There needs to be a higher bar before you can consider the input “transformed” otherwise it will continue to be abused in the laziest/cheapest way possible
I don’t know what that is talking about.
It means loading copyrighted material into your training data does not inherently absolve you of copyright liability, otherwise there’s no reason not to have chatgpt spit out full Dr Suess books if you ask for a story.
Yes, Otherwise it wouldn’t lower the value.
There is a lot of disinformation being spread, maybe to influence juries, or maybe to undermine the already beleaguered rule of law in the US. The truth is that there is very little unexpected about these judgments. That’s how fair use works.