cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 9 days agoSeems like the most reasonable explanationlemmy.mlimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up11.47Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.47Karrow-down1imageSeems like the most reasonable explanationlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squarearrow74@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up38·8 days ago They were insinuating something false That’s the premise for a lot of comedy
minus-squareRizzRustbolt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down9·8 days agoTell that to Hisan Minhaj.
minus-squareNotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 days agoYou’re having a bad day, huh? That sucks.
minus-squareOhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·8 days agoYou have a hard time spotting sarcasm, don’t you?
minus-squareSLVRDRGN@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·7 days agoYeah but it very clearly is a joke - and one meant to point out how absurd it is to say that no abuse happened at all. No?
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoMaybe conspiracy theorists need more bait
deleted by creator
That’s the premise for a lot of comedy
Tell that to Hisan Minhaj.
You’re having a bad day, huh? That sucks.
You have a hard time spotting sarcasm, don’t you?
What is false?
deleted by creator
Yeah but it very clearly is a joke - and one meant to point out how absurd it is to say that no abuse happened at all. No?
Maybe conspiracy theorists need more bait