• Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The MEXICAN government ruling in the interests of the people? This is absolutely delusional. Mexico is one of the most corrupt, dangerous, and unstable places in the world. The country is quickly turning into a warzone because of the cartels, and both the current and previous presidents and their government aren’t doing anything about it because they’re bought.

    A government making a chocolate bar to distract from the crippling poverty and crime is not good governance, it’s the opposite.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      Mexico’s murder rate per 100 000 is 24.9, meaning you’re on average safer in Mexico than in Newark, Memphis, Cleveland, Kansas City, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Detroit, Baltimore or St. Louis.

      Never mind that murders in Mexico are generally committed using American firearms, and for American money over drugs that are to be sold in America. Mexico’s problem is America. So while we wait for America to selfdestruct, I guess they might as well get to work on public health issues.

      Obviously not saying that cartels are not a huge fucking problem. It’s hard to get good politicians when they murder anyone who resists them. But the cartels are in large part a product of America’s failures. Europeans are not innocent either - fuck every coke snorting upper class brat who is having their pathetic highs at the expense of a whole fucking continent.

      /rant

      • Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Wait I’m confused, so Mexico is safer than the USA, but they murder any politician who goes against the cartel?

        Doesn’t sound so safe to me?

    • sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Tell me you haven’t been to Mexico without telling me you haven’t been to Mexico.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              By whether they’re making verifiable and objective claims? They aren’t, really, and they certainly didn’t source theirs, but it’s a lot more convincing to say that instead of making your own unsourced accusations.

            • Obinice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I think the issue is that you’ve not provided evidence that the other user supports Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

              At the end of the day it’s just an internet argument and not worth it, but if you want to make your point, I’d start by getting that evidence.

              I do agree in principle that I would think twice before agreeing with any position a genocide supporter takes, though that doesn’t necessarily mean I will disagree on any particular point after giving it due thought. If they said throwing puppies from a roof was bad, I’d agree, for example.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I was there a year ago. It was nice enough, not nearly as worrisome as I thought it would be. Yes, I stayed in the tourist areas, no I didn’t wander into the rural areas, no I didn’t try to start shit in clubs, yes I saw armed military on patrol. There were a lot of people trying to live their lives despite the serious crime in the region.

          There are absolutely terrible things happening there and I would love for them to get better. I can say the same thing about the US. At least Mexico isn’t waging war on my country, trade or otherwise.