We all see and hear what goes on over there. Kim will execute kids if they don’t cheer hard enough at his birthday party or something? He’s always threatening to nuke countries and is probably has the highest domestic kill count out of any world leader today.

So I ask? Why don’t any other countries step in to help those people. I saw a survey asking Americans and Escaped North Koreans would they migrate to North Korea and to the US if given the chance (hypothetical for the refugees). And it was like <0.1% to 95%. Obviously those people live in terror.

Why do we just allow this to happen in modern civilization? Nukes on South Korea? Is just not lucrative to step in? SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME PLEASE!?

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      1·
      2 days ago

      Well then, I hope you get to experience the same kind of “help” that the Korean people received. Maybe if someone drops chemical and biological weapons on you and your family, it’ll cause people to be wealthier 70 years from now. Sound good?

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        11·
        2 days ago

        I mean Soviet Union did attack us and cause destruction and deaths in name of helping the Finnish people during Winter War. War reparations after the following Continuation War helped us industrialize. And we’re now pretty wealthy. So I guess we already experienced some of it?

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          1·
          2 days ago

          War reparations after the following Continuation War helped us industrialize

          Maybe the US should pay the DPRK war reparations, then.

          Maybe they should’ve just done that without dropping chemical and biological weapons on innocent civilians first.

          If only the Soviets had won, maybe monsters like you wouldn’t exist. No wonder you take the side of the Korean fascists, fascist collaborators gotta stick together, huh?

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            11·
            2 days ago

            I mean we paid reparations because USSR won. If you wanted to compare Finland and NK then the situation would be that USA won and forced NK to pay the US.

            If only the Soviets had won, maybe monsters like you wouldn’t exist.

            Monster? You’re getting a bit emotional

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              1·
              2 days ago

              Oh, am I getting emotional? Over the dropping of chemical and biological weapons on civilians? Oh dear!

              Maybe you should get more fucking emotional. Like what the fuck is wrong with you? You know the US literally recruited Unit 731 to help them commit atrocities, right? Maybe dropping the fucking plague and smallpox onto civilians shouldn’t be treated with fucking “poise and rationality!”

              Anyone who defends that shit is too far gone to be reeducated.

              • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                11·
                2 days ago

                I meant emotional to a degree that’s preventing you from actually understanding what I’ve been saying. I’ve been agains the whole Korean War. It was a complete waste.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  1·
                  2 days ago

                  Right. You “”“oppose”“” the war in the sense that you oppose the North, in the sense that you support sending troops in. So when you say you “”“oppose”“” the war, what you’re actually saying is that you support it.

                  Why do you fascists always play these word games? We both understand that your position of “giving kids smallpox is good, actually” is completely abhorrent and indefensible, but that’s not going to change just because you twist some words around.

                  • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                    11·
                    2 days ago

                    I think it would’ve still been bad if it wasn’t the North who started it. Whoever started it of course the other side is going to fight back. So best not to start wars.

                    It’s my hot take that’s making you fume and rant about fascists hah.