We all see and hear what goes on over there. Kim will execute kids if they don’t cheer hard enough at his birthday party or something? He’s always threatening to nuke countries and is probably has the highest domestic kill count out of any world leader today.

So I ask? Why don’t any other countries step in to help those people. I saw a survey asking Americans and Escaped North Koreans would they migrate to North Korea and to the US if given the chance (hypothetical for the refugees). And it was like <0.1% to 95%. Obviously those people live in terror.

Why do we just allow this to happen in modern civilization? Nukes on South Korea? Is just not lucrative to step in? SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME PLEASE!?

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    1·
    2 days ago

    Right. You “”“oppose”“” the war in the sense that you oppose the North, in the sense that you support sending troops in. So when you say you “”“oppose”“” the war, what you’re actually saying is that you support it.

    Why do you fascists always play these word games? We both understand that your position of “giving kids smallpox is good, actually” is completely abhorrent and indefensible, but that’s not going to change just because you twist some words around.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      11·
      2 days ago

      I think it would’ve still been bad if it wasn’t the North who started it. Whoever started it of course the other side is going to fight back. So best not to start wars.

      It’s my hot take that’s making you fume and rant about fascists hah.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        1·
        2 days ago

        “I only support infecting children with smallpox, and this crazy leftist called me a fascist over it!”

        Maybe try not supporting biological warfare if you don’t want to get called a fascist, fascist.

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          11·
          2 days ago

          “I don’t think North Korea should’ve started that war, nothing was gained and many horrible things happened because of it”

          “You are a fascist who supports infecting children with smallpox!!”

          lol

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            1·
            2 days ago

            You support UN/US intervention. UN/US intervention included infecting children with smallpox. You know this, I’ve told you repeatedly and you have neither denied nor condemned it, you haven’t even acknowledged it. Because you support it. In the same way someone who defends Nazi Germany and goes mysteriously silent whenever the Holocaust is brought up supports the Holocaust. You are fascist scum.

            • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
              11·
              2 days ago

              I didn’t say I supported it though. You just assumed that because I thought North Korea shouldn’t have started the war.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                1·
                2 days ago

                You said that the Koreans “benefitted” from UN involvement, now you’re saying you don’t support UN involvement? Would you deprive Koreans of the benefit of being infected with smallpox?

                Or is this another one of your word games, where I correctly understood your position, but because you didn’t technically explicitly say it it doesn’t count? The classic “motte and bailey” tactic?

                • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                  11·
                  1 day ago

                  You asked who benefited and I answered that. It’s not an endorsement lol. North Korea benefited from China entering the war. Do I now support Chinese involvement?

                  Like said, you’re getting too emotional to actually consider what is being said…

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    1·
                    1 day ago

                    Can I just get a straight answer? Do you or do you not support UN intervention in the Korean War? Yes or no, no more evasion, no more word games.