Sameer Samat, president of Android ecosystem at Google, asked a TechRadar journalist why they were using an Apple Watch, iPhone, and MacBook:

I asked because we’re going to be combining Chrome OS and Android into a single platform, and I am very interested in how people are using their laptops these days and what they’re getting done.

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Two decades ago people would remember when M$ decided to do something very similar on the desktop. Nothing has changed.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ll thank you not to refer to 2012 as “two decades ago.” Felt like I drank from the wrong grail, before double-checking when Windows 8 came out.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Who’s talking about Windows 8 or 2012? I said 2 decades and meant it. I wasn’t talking about the same time frame, just pointing out the history we are repeating. I was talking about “United States vs Microsoft Corp.” (2001). That would have been regarding Windows 98 and Windows XP. Internet ExplorerEdge is still an integral and unremovable component of Microsoft’s operating systems to this day and I guess everyone really has forgotten about Netscape Navigator.

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Why did you obliquely reference a different company doing a completely different thing? Microsoft did do something very similar on desktop - making Windows 8 tablet-centric. Nothing in XP or especially 98 has anything to do with mobile computing.

              • Wolf314159@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                It’s not a completely different thing. They were both trying to fully integrate the operating system and the web browser into one monolithic and inescapable thing: Windows XP + Internet Explorer to squash competition on the desktop; Linux + Chrome to squash competition on laptops; Android + Chrome OS to squash competition in the mobile space. The money to be made on operating systems is trivial in the consumer space compared to the power of control over platforms (like web browsers) that deliver advertisements and harvest data from comsumers. M$ saw the writing on the wall way back then in their fight with Netscape Navigator. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

                I feel like I’m talking to an AI chatbot completely unable to reason abstractly or consider the full context of the conversation.

                • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Ah, so there’s a grain of sense in this. Shame about the aggressive irony in whinging about tone while throwing dull insults.

                  The money to be made on operating systems was power over platforms, back in Windows 98 times. That’s the whole reason the Xbox project emerged. They wanted to PC-ify consoles on the assumption they’d still own PCs. The project succeeded! The assumption, not so much.

                  I think MS barged its way into browsers because it already owned the desktop, and browsers were the next big thing, and barging was just how they did things. And they only integrated IE in the sense you could not uninstall it. Windows obviously still ran Netscape (and later Firefox), and the OS needing a browser is vastly different from the OS being a browser.