not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agothe war on computationlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square240fedilinkarrow-up11.61Karrow-down114file-text
arrow-up11.59Karrow-down1imagethe war on computationlemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agomessage-square240fedilinkfile-text
https://infosec.exchange/@ryanc/114901140203859448 i recomend this ancient talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUEvRyemKSg https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=HUEvRyemKSg
minus-squareChill_Dan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days agoWhy not? I remember buying phones that could be unlocked and had no issues with them updating after doing so.
minus-squareLH0ezVT@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoSame. Why should bootloader unlock stop OTAs? Sure, i dont doubt that some manufacturer somewhere does this, but I would not expect it to be the norm.
Why not? I remember buying phones that could be unlocked and had no issues with them updating after doing so.
Same. Why should bootloader unlock stop OTAs? Sure, i dont doubt that some manufacturer somewhere does this, but I would not expect it to be the norm.