• Einar@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      3.1 looked terrible.

      2000 was stable and looked decent for it’s time. Enjoyed the look of 10, but behind the scenes it was invasive. 11 is terrible on the looks* and the invasiveness.

      *) seriously… it looks dated and cluttered after using something like Gnome for a while

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        2000 was amazing. Constantly rebooting was a normal thing and everyone from techs to end users was fine with it, because it was normal.

        One day I was telling my bf, “This thing has been running for a month! I got 30-days uptime!”