PugJesus@lemmy.world to The Internet in Ancient Times@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoHey cavemen! Sharpen up your sticks!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1605arrow-down19
arrow-up1596arrow-down1imageHey cavemen! Sharpen up your sticks!lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to The Internet in Ancient Times@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-squarePrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down7·2 months agoNo one is saying that you’re just chucking a Gorilla and a Human/group of humans into a ring. if the human/humans know that they will be fighting a Gorilla then they can fashion weapons and strategies. A single human could easily kill a gorilla if they could choose the time and place of the engagement. It’s how we became the dominant species on the planet
minus-squareAlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 months agoThe premise is and has always been 100 unarmed humans (I think men, specifically). That is exactly what everyone has been saying the whole time. 100 unarmed humans in a ring with 1 gorilla.
minus-squarePrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 months agoI’ve not heard unarmed being specified. but that’s not how humans fight. You could start unarmed and then improvise a weapon
minus-squareAlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 months agoRight, I don’t know how you missed it, it’s been unarmed the whole time. It’s built into the premise of the original viral post. It’s a hypothetical. What you’re saying right now doesn’t matter. The hypothetical premise has always been “unarmed”. Look it up lol. Edit: i looked it up and cannot find the “original hypothetical premise” I claimed existed, so, fuck me. That being said… yeah. One man with a weapon bodies a gorilla. People are so fucking stupid.
minus-squareAlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoThink about how stupid the average person is, and then remember that about 50 of them are stupider than that! Hahah
minus-squareArchangel1313@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·2 months agoExactly. Weapons are required. Unarmed? Fuck, no.
minus-squareLilB0kChoy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·2 months agoI don’t use YouTube and you’re taking a theoretical exercise very seriously. The reason people debate this question is because there is no definitive right answer. Maybe take a couple deep breaths and calm down.
No one is saying that you’re just chucking a Gorilla and a Human/group of humans into a ring.
if the human/humans know that they will be fighting a Gorilla then they can fashion weapons and strategies.
A single human could easily kill a gorilla if they could choose the time and place of the engagement.
It’s how we became the dominant species on the planet
The premise is and has always been 100 unarmed humans (I think men, specifically).
That is exactly what everyone has been saying the whole time. 100 unarmed humans in a ring with 1 gorilla.
I’ve not heard
unarmedbeing specified. but that’s not how humans fight.You could start unarmed and then improvise a weapon
Right, I don’t know how you missed it, it’s been unarmed the whole time. It’s built into the premise of the original viral post.
It’s a hypothetical. What you’re saying right now doesn’t matter. The hypothetical premise has always been “unarmed”. Look it up lol.
Edit: i looked it up and cannot find the “original hypothetical premise” I claimed existed, so, fuck me.
That being said… yeah. One man with a weapon bodies a gorilla. People are so fucking stupid.
deleted by creator
Think about how stupid the average person is, and then remember that about 50 of them are stupider than that! Hahah
deleted by creator
Exactly. Weapons are required.
Unarmed? Fuck, no.
deleted by creator
I don’t use YouTube and you’re taking a theoretical exercise very seriously. The reason people debate this question is because there is no definitive right answer.
Maybe take a couple deep breaths and calm down.
deleted by creator