Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-228 天前Sweden prime minister under fire after admitting that he regularly consults AI tools for a second opinionwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up1432arrow-down15cross-posted to: europe@feddit.org
arrow-up1427arrow-down1external-linkSweden prime minister under fire after admitting that he regularly consults AI tools for a second opinionwww.theguardian.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-228 天前message-square130fedilinkcross-posted to: europe@feddit.org
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·29 天前of course you can. why would a career politician who has very visibly been interested only in politics since his teens know how to do that?
minus-squareBeacon@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 天前Hah, true. But the point still stands that using an llm itself wasn’t a bad thing
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·29 天前i’d say it’s still bad because this is the leader of a government consulting with a stochastic parrot instead of experts.
minus-squareBeacon@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 天前Presumably it wasn’t instead of, it was in addition to, and therefore totally fine
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·29 天前it’s still not fine, as per my first point. it’s leaking information to foreign interests.
minus-squareBeacon@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·29 天前Right, but we already addressed that above. If it’s done on a local pc’s ai that doesn’t operate using a net connection, and is used in addition to rather than instead of consulting with people, then it’s totally fine
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·28 天前yeah but then we’re no longer discussing the topic the thread is about.
of course you can. why would a career politician who has very visibly been interested only in politics since his teens know how to do that?
Hah, true. But the point still stands that using an llm itself wasn’t a bad thing
i’d say it’s still bad because this is the leader of a government consulting with a stochastic parrot instead of experts.
Presumably it wasn’t instead of, it was in addition to, and therefore totally fine
it’s still not fine, as per my first point. it’s leaking information to foreign interests.
Right, but we already addressed that above. If it’s done on a local pc’s ai that doesn’t operate using a net connection, and is used in addition to rather than instead of consulting with people, then it’s totally fine
yeah but then we’re no longer discussing the topic the thread is about.