According to their fascist dogma, dissent is inherently treasonous, so they won’t need any further justification.
Also, Wilhoit’s Law applies:
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition … There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect
If someone voices something different than what they want, they label them as communist extremists and create a fake group name like antifa to which they claim they were apart of. Which they already labeled antifa as a terrorist organization, thus giving them the ability to prosecute with no way to prove someone isn’t in antifa, as the group doesn’t really even exist unless it’s 1930s Germany. Whether or not they end up being able prove your guilty, remember Trump during his first term stated he believed in taking away the guns first, and then doing the investigation. Mike Pence had to walk him back on that because it would be unconstitutional.
Just the “liberal” guns, at first…
How are they going to justify that?
With lies, like everything else
I know I just don’t see that going well. Especially since all the no limits on gun ownership rhetoric from the last 20 years
Maga dipshits have proven time and again they don’t care about what stance they held yesterday if they’re told to think otherwise today.
Why do you think they’ll need to justify it?
Call them unAmerican and take their guns; if they complain, throw them in Alligator Auschwitz
According to their fascist dogma, dissent is inherently treasonous, so they won’t need any further justification.
Also, Wilhoit’s Law applies:
And once they eliminate the out-group it will never be them who is the new out-group.
How did Taco “justify” DC?
If someone voices something different than what they want, they label them as communist extremists and create a fake group name like antifa to which they claim they were apart of. Which they already labeled antifa as a terrorist organization, thus giving them the ability to prosecute with no way to prove someone isn’t in antifa, as the group doesn’t really even exist unless it’s 1930s Germany. Whether or not they end up being able prove your guilty, remember Trump during his first term stated he believed in taking away the guns first, and then doing the investigation. Mike Pence had to walk him back on that because it would be unconstitutional.
To be fair it doesn’t seem that far from 1930s Germany
It’s not. They’re following the same path almost exactly.
My bet is all at once. Within a year.