• spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    she actually significantly cut back on usage and bought carbon credits to compensate for her excess usage since criticism :) fun fact

    i just had to get ahead of the jokes as the original creator of the fossil fuel windoes 95 meme and an avid swiftie

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Carbon credits are bullshit, you can’t put fossil fuels back in the ground.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        The idea is theoretically viable, if you’re actually paying for carbon sequestration. You emit X tons of carbon, you sequester X+Y tons of carbon (where Y > 0), that’s a net win.

        The problem is that no-one is doing that because it’s several orders of magnitude cheaper to offer carbon credits to “save” forests that no-one was planning on cutting down. You get a clean conscience at a reasonable cost, some middlemen get richer, the planet gets warmer.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        good point! however no other mega celeb or ceo that flys as much as or more than taylor is buying those offsets. u gotta remember that.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Fair enough. I’m not a Swiftie but I don’t particularly dislike her either other than being a billionaire. But yeah I do find it a bit disturbing how people are so ready to shit on her specifically for being a successful woman. Shit on her for being a billionaire, not a woman.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        And then everyone says “oh Gabe Newell being a billionaire is fine, Valve is such a great company” etc etc

        OK, that’s probably accentuated here because of all the pro-linux PC gaming people here, but still. Valve has done some pretty bad stuff too. And Gabe is out there buying yacht companies…

        • Sam, The Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          All billionaires are corrupt. I don’t care if they’re* cute or techy, you don’t get that kind of money without being a bastard.

          *Edit: spelling

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Was her being a woman ever explicitly part of the ‘swift takes too many unnecessary private plane flights’ thing? I never really noticed that, and it’s not like she takes those flights because she’s female, it’s mostly because of her job.

        Though I suppose people wouldn’t joke about Swift’s hypothetical wedding if she wasn’t a woman …

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The fact that she’s a woman is being pointed out because there are at least one hundred men you could target for similar acts. I’m going to point out again what the image above says:

          That’s okay. Her actions are wrong. Just remember that, even among the well meaning, there is a disturbing tendency to make a woman the scapegoat, when many other candidates better fit the bill.

          • Velypso@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Dont use her gender to defend her actions.

            Her popularity among teens and young adults is the reason she was focused on, jesus christ.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              bro will literally see the sentence “her actions are wrong” and accuse the other person of “defending her actions”

              some people on the internet are here to speak rather than read, and i fear you are one of them