I don’t hate AI, I’m mostly concerned about it’s impact to artists. This is an ai detector, so it’s probably beneficial to artists. Ofc energy usage and whatnot is a concern too, but 2 inferences that this thing is doing is probably barely any energy usage compared to like toasting a piece of bread since it only takes a second or two to provide results
When all this tech was new I was following it very closely actually and installing a lot of local image models, but now that things have settled it seems pretty straightforwardly net negative outside of maybe DLSS. (also, the last big improvement in local image models was like a year ago, so it’s not really interesting to follow anymore)
Using AI to detect if an image is AI because you hate AI is a special breed of hypocrisy.
I don’t hate AI, I’m mostly concerned about it’s impact to artists. This is an ai detector, so it’s probably beneficial to artists. Ofc energy usage and whatnot is a concern too, but 2 inferences that this thing is doing is probably barely any energy usage compared to like toasting a piece of bread since it only takes a second or two to provide results
When all this tech was new I was following it very closely actually and installing a lot of local image models, but now that things have settled it seems pretty straightforwardly net negative outside of maybe DLSS. (also, the last big improvement in local image models was like a year ago, so it’s not really interesting to follow anymore)
I don’t know how AI detectors work, seems like it would just be the more classical machine learning classification approach, but maybe not.
All AI is just rebranded machine learning, is it not?
Being able to reasonably generate understandable language is an achievement. Trying to pretend it’s can reason because of that is a mistake.
dis i agree with-