• toynbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Thanks for understanding! We work with an immutable system at my office and it’s fine, I just don’t see the need for it on my desktop (yet). Next time I replace any of my server hardware (or otherwise reformat) I expect I’ll go immutable.

    Thanks!

    • rozodru@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      no prob. I think for certain situations immutable is good. Like in your cause where you use it at work, it makes sense to have a workplace on an immutable distro, just makes things easier. In my case since I’m a developer it also makes sense as the likely hood of me absolutely breaking something is high. plus with nix and the nix flakes and nix shell environments it makes developing a breeze.

      For someone at home who is NEW to Linux, yeah it also makes sense. For everyone else? meh I don’t really see a need for it if you know what you’re doing. Don’t get me wrong I love Arch and all its various forks, especially CachyOS, so I mean if it works for you then why go immutable? there’s no right and wrong distro for a user, it’s whatever they prefer. Hell a buddy of mine uses Slackware and will never move from it.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This is a very canny take, and I appreciate the frankness of it. I find myself agreeing with basically everything you say (except about OS’ I don’t use because I don’t have enough of an opinion).

        Thanks for being a positive representative of the Linux community!