• Amuletta@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is in central Saskatchewan. Presumably those southwest roofs are flat - this isn’t.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Low slope, so considered flat for most codes, can’t use shingles. Basically every commercial roof has rocks, but In the last decade they’ve shifted to a vinyl. Lighter, handles more snow load.

      • Amuletta@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They probably could use shingles, there are plenty of surrounding houses with about the same pitch that do.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          From one to next they look really similar.

          2:12 is low slope iirc. So 3:12 can use shingles, but not 2:12.

          You’re right though, could just be a look choice on a higher slope. Could be a “trial” roof or something who knows.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Weird. I would assume that rocks would be problematic for snow and would just encourage snow to stick and add street to the framing.

      The only rock roofs I’ve ever come across are in temperate places that don’t get snow.