b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agoCracked Red Eye Orb Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1365arrow-down14
arrow-up1361arrow-down1imageCracked Red Eye Orb Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneb161@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareIgnotum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up51·2 days agoSo that’s why they’re not doing the “despite making up x% of the population” argument, doesn’t work well when they’re 0.5-1% and are only behind 0.08% of shootings
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 days agoAny number of mass shootings is too many, so technically he was correct.
minus-squarecuerdo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·2 days agoHe didn’t answer the question, so he was not correct.
minus-squareAlwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoHe died as he lived.
minus-squarertxn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 days agoAbsolutely spewing stuff from an unfortunate hole in his neck?
minus-squareAlwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoI was saying both being wrong and not answering the question; but when you’re right you’re right.
It’s 5 out of 5700, IIRC
So that’s why they’re not doing the “despite making up x% of the population” argument, doesn’t work well when they’re 0.5-1% and are only behind 0.08% of shootings
Any number of mass shootings is too many, so technically he was correct.
He didn’t answer the question, so he was not correct.
He died as he lived.
Absolutely spewing stuff from an unfortunate hole in his neck?
I was saying both being wrong and not answering the question; but when you’re right you’re right.
y’all both right
That is actually too few