• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You really don’t have to accept it in order for it to be our current reality.

    What is the point of labels like this if they don’t signal what it is you believe, relatively accurately?

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      What is the point of labels like this if they don’t signal what it is you believe, relatively accurately?

      This is exactly why it’s necessary to push back on those who would twist it to mean something else.

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          All battles are hopeless when no one fights them.

          You’re not wrong, though. But even thirty years would be enough to make a change, perhaps… or maybe it seems that way to me because that’s when I started paying attention.

          Friggen Tea Party bullshit was when it really started sliding downhill fast, IMO.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Just a weird hill to die on… Doesn’t seem worth it, even if it was possible to accomplish (which I do not believe it is). Seems like you’d not want to label yourself with such a universally tainted title. I’m certain that there are people out there with similar positions as you who understand they’re not conseratives, and have another word for it. You should find those people.

            Otherwise everyone will just assume you’re a piece of shit when you tell them you’re a conservative. And rightfully so.

            The fact that you’re even here having an honest discussion about politics means you’re not a conservative.